HIROx0529, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi HIROx0529! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

“Leave a Message”

edit

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, HIROx0529. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Rolling Stone Top 100 top-ten singles in 2019, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Feliz Navidad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:47, 31 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Regarding your edits to List of Rolling Stone Top 100 number-one songs of 2019

edit

Please do not update the list before the chart says "Finalized" in the top-left corner above the chart per WP:RSCHART. At the time you updated this list yesterday, it still said "Projected" and I know this as I checked on it. If you update any Rolling Stone chart statistics before the weekly chart says "Finalized", you will be reverted. Thank you. Ss112 01:49, 1 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for correcting my mistake. HIROx0529 (talk) 02:33, 1 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

January 2020

edit

  Hello, I'm Ss112. I noticed that you made one or more edits to an article, List of Rolling Stone Top 100 number-one songs of 2019, concerning the updates of review statistics, box office numbers, sports statistics, or some other frequently updated data with a fixed web address, but you did not update the |access-date= parameter in the citation template. The |access-date= parameter is the full date when the content pointed to by the URL was last verified to be working and supporting the text being cited in the article. This means that the parameter needs to be updated whenever the content is updated. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ss112 18:04, 6 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of Rolling Stone Top 100 top-ten songs in 2020 for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Rolling Stone Top 100 top-ten songs in 2020 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Rolling Stone Top 100 top-ten songs in 2019 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 17:21, 8 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of Rolling Stone Top 200 number-one albums of 2020 for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Rolling Stone Top 200 number-one albums of 2020 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Rolling Stone Top 200 number-one albums of 2020 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lil-℧niquԐ1 - (Talk) - 14:57, 16 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nadine Lustre (EP), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Reid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:28, 20 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited James Reid discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Reid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 13 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Image without license

edit

Unspecified source/license for File:IvanaContract.jpeg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:IvanaContract.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 18:01, 12 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Non-free rationale for File:IvanaContract.jpeg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:IvanaContract.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 20:27, 12 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Revision of SB19 as of 17:30, 12 June 2020

edit

Hello. I have an issue with the reversion made to the reference edit for the track 'Bakit Ba Ikaw'. The text contains grammatical errors and does not make sense at all. While this may seem trivial, it affects the overall quality of the Wiki page. Since our shared goal is to improve the quality of the page, given the flags against it, then that passage should be improved. Thank you. Gmumma73 (talk) 02:45, 13 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:IvanaContract.jpeg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:IvanaContract.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:43, 14 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of Rolling Stone Top 100 number-one songs of 2019 for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Rolling Stone Top 100 number-one songs of 2019, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Rolling Stone Top 100 number-one songs of 2019 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply