Hi Reviewers of Wikipedia, there are some issues I would like to address. I have put a lot of time and effort into the creation of Harry C. Giese and I would like to be informed if the article is to be edited so that I can review the changes before they are made. I have noticed that the editors of Wikipedia have not only deleted links and statements that were only meant for both the benefit of the article and Wikipedia itself and I would like to be informed of these changes next time before they are made. I would also like to add that the references in the article are current and have been added in a proper citation style, and are most likely not susceptible to link rot any time soon. Could the kind reviewers please review the article and respond with the changes that need to be made, so that I may do that changes myself and know fully what is happening, rather than checking on my article and finding that changes have been made to the information I have worked hard to compile without my consent. Regards, HCGiese.

Firstly, the tool used to keep an eye on articles is the watchlist. You can add an article to your watchlist by clicking on the small star symbol at the top of the article, to the left of the search box. You can check your watchlist via the "Watchlist" link at the very top of the page, roughly above the star symbol.
Secondly, no Wikipedia editor gets to own an article, not even the creator. Changes to the article will be made without prior notification and without any requirement of consent from you. Wikipedia is a collaborative project, and if people intend to improve the article, they do not (and should not) need to use you as an intermediary. If you disagree with some of those changes you can revert them, but except in cases of obvious vandalism (say, changing all the content into "Joe is stupid") you should leave an edit summary that explains why you revert the edit or, better yet, explain your rationale on the article's talk page.
Thirdly, the article has been reviewed and accepted; it's a full article now, and unlike for drafts there's no dedicated review process for changes made to articles. If you have specific questions about the changes I'll happily reply, but to be honest I'm not interested enough in that topic to permanently review and re-review the article. Huon (talk) 00:36, 11 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi Huon Your assistance, advice and expertise through this process is really appreciated. The article now looks professional. Regards HCGieseHCGiese (talk) 04:23, 11 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome, I'm happy to help. Huon (talk) 05:03, 11 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi Wikipedia editors: A distinction has been made between the articles on Harry C. Giese, Australian public servant and Harry Giese, German voice actor, but there is no disambiguation in the summary on the latter which appears prominently to the right of the main search engine listings. From your experience and knowledge, please suggest how disambiguation can best be added to this. Regards, HCGieseHCGiese (talk) 23:22, 12 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

The Harry Giese article carries a hatnote pointing to Harry C. Giese. Whatever the search engines do or don't do is not a Wikipedia issue; we don't (and shouldn't) deal in search engine optimization and cannot directly influence the search engines. Huon (talk) 23:29, 12 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi Huon and other editors: The hatnote is part of the two articles and should also be included in any summary. Surely disambiguation is a Wikipedia issue, not a Google (etc) one? This concerns accuracy and fairness, not SEO. Do others have ideas about this? Thanks HCGieseHCGiese (talk) 22:53, 13 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

And Wikipedia already disambiguates. Both articles carry hatnotes pointing to each other. How Google summarizes the articles and whether its summary includes the hatnotes is beyond our control. I don't quite understand what you think should be done, but if you mean to propose that in addition to, or instead of, the hatnote the first paragraph of the Harry Giese article should also contain a disambiguation, that would violate Wikipedia's guideline on lead sections and will not be done. Huon (talk) 23:15, 13 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi Huon and other editors: Disambiguation certainly should not be part of a lead section, which would only engender further confusion. Thanks for your responses, Huon. I'll think about other ways of getting this point over, including through the various Wikipedia discussion channels, as suggested. HCGieseHCGiese (talk) 22:59, 15 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

A belated welcome!

edit
 
Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!  

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, HCGiese. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Huon (talk) 01:25, 30 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Some comments: First of all, your draft is at WT:Articles for creation/Harry Giese 1913-2000 Australia - that's the preferred location for drafts awaiting review. This page had redirected to the draft, but since it's meant as a place for other users to contact you, I removed the redirect. DragonflySixtyseven and I have done some copyediting to make the draft's layout conform to Wikipedia's standards and to add links to other Wikipedia articles. That brings me to the next question: The draft mentions Giese was active in Northern Territory Rugby. Was that the Northern Territory Rugby Union, the Northern Territory Rugby League, or both? A link to the correct organization(s) would be nice. Huon (talk) 01:25, 30 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at AfC Harry C. Giese was accepted

edit
 
Harry C. Giese, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

The Ukulele Guy - Aggie80 (talk) 16:52, 6 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harry Giese (disambiguation) (October 6)

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

October 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Harry C. Giese may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Australia]] and living and working in [[Darwin, Northern Territory|Darwin]], [[Northern Territory]]), he was an [[Australian]] administrator, public servant and community leader. Giese was a

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:26, 9 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Harry Giese while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of more than one account or IP address by one person. If this was not your intention, then please always remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:53, 11 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Harry C. Giese, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Please stop changing the hatnotes. They're correct as they stand now. Also, articles typically shouldn't be added to red categories. Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:28, 18 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

December 2013

edit

  Hello, HCGiese. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Harry C. Giese, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

  • Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
  • Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
  • Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
  • Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 17:58, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Harry Giese (disambiguation), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:04, 7 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Harry C. Giese, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 10 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Harry Giese (disambiguation)

edit
 

Hello HCGiese. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Harry Giese (disambiguation)".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Harry Giese (disambiguation)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 06:14, 9 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

June 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Giese may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * [[Harry C. Giese]] (1913-2000] - Australian administrator, public servant and community leader

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:43, 23 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Image without license

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Harry C. Giese 1913-2000 Darwin Australia in the 1970s.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 05:18, 1 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Picture for article and disambiguation

Thank you for all your recent comments and suggestions. The picture File:Harry C. Giese 1913-2000 Darwin Australia in the 1970s.jpg recently disappeared from his Wikipedia article, so was reloaded. All the relevant Creative Commons licensing procedures had been gone through and approved when it was originally added to the article. Can an experienced editor please explain why this happened and how it can be put right? Before the article was approved, the advice given was that a disambiguation page was not appropriate, but a hatnote was. This has remained in place for six months and read: 'This article is about the Australian public servant, Harry C. Giese. For the German voice actor, see Harry Giese.' Now the second part of the hatnote has been changed to read: 'For other uses, see Harry C. Giese (disambiguation)' with a distracting and useless hyperlink. The aim of the original hatnote was to distinguish between two completely unrelated people. Experienced editors who uphold Wikipedia's values most welcome to comment and --please!--assist.HCGiese (talk) 06:06, 3 July 2014 (UTC)HCGieseReply

I've updated the hatnote [1] but am leaving the help request open so that someone else may still assist with the image issue. Dru of Id (talk) 14:13, 3 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
There are two images, Commons:File:Harry Giese 1913-2000 Darwin Australia in the 1970s.jpg at the Commons and File:Harry C. Giese 1913-2000 Darwin Australia in the 1970s.jpg on Wikipedia itself. The former has the OTRS tag; the latter seems a duplicate that was probably uploaded in error, possibly due to some confusion about the file name. Apparently you broke the image link yourself with this edit; the Commons image itself was not deleted. I'll restore the link to the Commons file and delete the local one as a duplicate (speedy deletion criterion F8). Huon (talk) 18:24, 3 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Many thanks for your speedy and helpful responses. HCGiese (talk) 02:00, 4 July 2014 (UTC)HCGieseReply

Hi Editors With the image used in this article, confusion is still occurring in the search engine listings, labelling and description. Can the image name be amended to File:Harry C. Giese 1913-2000 Darwin Australia in the 1970s.jpg (adding the initial in the registration) to distinguish it from the picture of the youthful German voice actor who is unrelated to the Australian in beliefs, actions, time and place. Thanks.HCGiese (talk) 23:15, 7 July 2014 (UTC)HCGieseReply

If that image is to be renamed, that would have to be done at the Wikimedia Commons; see their instructions. However, since the file name already includes his dates of birth and death, as well as the continent (!), I'd say the chance of confusion with the German voice actor is so low that there's no need to bother with renaming it. Or to put it this way: If "Australia" is not enough of a clue that this isn't about the German voice actor, I doubt "C." would be. Huon (talk) 23:41, 7 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Harry C. Giese, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 1 July 2014 (UTC)Reply