Help me!

August 2019 edit

  Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:John Kilner, from its old location at User:Guitargirl300/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -Liancetalk/contribs 18:48, 28 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Welcome! edit

Hello, Guitargirl300, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! -Liancetalk/contribs 18:48, 28 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Help me! edit

Please help me with... I submitted an article on John Kilner back in August. The note said it can take 4 months, and it's almost been 4 months now... any idea when this might get reviewed? Thanks for your help! :)

Guitargirl300 (talk) 23:53, 11 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi Guitargirl300, I'm Alfie. Please be aware that the Articles for Creation process is entirely volunteer-driven, and there's no deadline on reviewing AfC submissions. Please be patient, and somebody will get round to your article eventually! -- a they/them | argue | contribs 00:37, 12 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ok, thank you! Guitargirl300 (talk) 03:58, 12 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Just wanted to check, is the draft in the correct place to be reviewed for posting? Thanks! Guitargirl300 (talk) 17:28, 13 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I have edited my article on John F. Kilner, but I have no idea if it's in the right place to be reviewed again, can anyone tell? Also, does it go back in the general mix (where it can take up to 4 months to be reviewed), or will it likely be reviewed any sooner? Thanks so much for your help! Guitargirl300 (talk) 03:54, 10 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Kilner (December 14) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 09:51, 14 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Guitargirl300! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 09:51, 14 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I have edited my article on John F. Kilner, but I have no idea if it's in the right place to be reviewed again, can anyone tell? Also, does it go back in the general mix (where it can take up to 4 months to be reviewed), or will it likely be reviewed any sooner? Thanks so much for your help! Guitargirl300 (talk) 03:06, 18 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Help me! edit

Hello, I edited my article on John F. Kilner 2 months ago, but I have no idea if it's in the right place to be reviewed again, can anyone tell? Also, does it go back in the general mix (where it can take up to 4 months to be reviewed), or will it likely be reviewed any sooner? Thanks so much for your help! Guitargirl300 (talk) 03:08, 18 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Kilner (March 21) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 02:45, 21 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:John Kilner has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:John Kilner. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 18:03, 21 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:John Kilner has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:John Kilner. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 21:24, 26 December 2020 (UTC)Reply


re-reviewing and COI edit

I think Kilner is notable , and since in my opinion the article remains unsatisfactorily verbose and promotional , I am willing to either edit and accept it myself, or ask some other editor to do so. But before I do that, Since this is your only contribution, and since it is written in an unencyclopedic manner, it is reasonable to ask whether you are a connected contributor, in which case you must declare the connection. Please see our rules on Conflict of Interest If you are writing this for pay or as a staff member of the organization, see also WP:PAID for the necessary disclosures. I will review it as soon as you inform me that you have provided the necessary information . DGG ( talk ) 21:30, 26 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello, thank you for taking the time to keep looking this over, i really appreciate it! To answer your question yes, I am his daughter. I am working off factual information from his career which I have carefully footnoted, and I tried to model this article off of Wikipedia articles about other influential academics and theological ethicists. You are right—I have not written a Wikipedia article before, and I did not know you needed to know any author-subject connection if the article was well-footnoted/cited. Sorry! Will this somehow invalidate the article? Guitargirl300 (talk) 22:26, 27 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Kilner (March 2) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NoahDavid771 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Noah!💬 21:51, 2 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:John Kilner edit

  Hello, Guitargirl300. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:John Kilner, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:03, 2 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:John Kilner has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:John Kilner. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 10:30, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Kilner has been accepted edit

 
John Kilner, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 10:31, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Reply