Grymbler

Blocked again

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:38, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

I'm sorry Grymbler (talk) 20:44, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

I know you mean well, but it should be clear to you by now that Wikipedia isn't the right project for you, as you seem to be unwilling to unable to understand our content policies. I'm sure there are other forums on the Internet for you to discuss minor aircraft incidents police shootings. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:07, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

I was surprised/shattered by this action. I can't remember, that i was blocked before. But you're right: I'm not willing to understand the content policies. That's why i accept that lecture. As long as i can write in the discussion section, i'm fine with that situation. Thank you for your feedback. Grymbler (talk) 09:40, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

You can discuss these topics outside of Wikipedia. I'm going to continue blocking you, whether on one of your IP ranges or named accounts, as long as you continue attempting to evade your block. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 12:30, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

I'm sorry again. This feels like it's going in a complete wrong direction that i wanted. In the german discussion section is already a link and information to that incident happened on October 2023. That's why i thought it is ok to write something about that in the discussion section.

I will not change anything on the article site anymore (independently of being blocked or not). I'm not planning to create other accounts and i don't try to evade my block. I'm shattered that you apparently assume that. I already told you, that i accept that lecture. Until this part, i was fine with your decission. Your last reply is very aggressive in a way which feels not appropriate for this situation. Grymbler (talk) 12:45, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

The situation is that you've been attempting to evade blocks for more than a year. Your poor-quality edits are nearly always reverted by another editor (not just me); that should indicate to you that your edits clearly aren't appropriate for Wikipedia, and that you are wasting many people's time. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:33, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for this information, because now it's pretty much clear to me, that you are talking to the wrong person respectively think I'm someone else.

I'm not attempting to evade blocks. Reason 1: I've now idea how to do this. Reason 2: I had never been blocked before.

The Titan Airways edit was my first one ever in the English section of Wikipedia. I'm a german user. My last edit in the German section was in September 2023 and it is still live.

I hope this is helpful to clarify the situation. Grymbler (talk) 21:27, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

I know you're not being truthful. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 01:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Ok, you had the history with that person. But that's not me and your behavior to me is unacceptable. I gave you the chance to clarify the situation but it looks like you're not interested. From now on, I will fight against your decision and your behavior to me. Grymbler (talk) 06:50, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Grymbler (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Admin blocked me, because of confusing me with someone else.Grymbler (talk) 06:50, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

The reason for the block is correct. 331dot (talk) 08:30, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Admin OhNoitsJamie blocked me, because he obviously is thinking, i'm someone, who is activally trying to disturb. But he is confusing me with someone else. Furthermore, I would like to complain about his behavior. Details can be found in the talk page. Grymbler (talk) 06:50, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Grymbler (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Same reasons as before. This block was made, because OhNoitsJamie is confusing me with someone else. I want a fair inspection in this case. I want to show, that the things i wrote are the truth. I want that someone will give me the chance to proof the truthness of what i was writing. I want to know the person who OhNoitsJamie is thinking i am. I will provide my personal information (german id card, video call, ...). I want someone who is investigating, not judging because of his emotions. Grymbler (talk) 14:29, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Confirming that this is clear block evasion. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:36, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.