User talk:Go Phightins!/Archive 27
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 20 | ← | Archive 25 | Archive 26 | Archive 27 | Archive 28 | Archive 29 | Archive 30 |
Merry Christmas!
|
Best wishes this holiday season |
| I would've sent you a death threat (just kidding) for supporting the Eagles last Sunday, but it's the holidays, and we're supposed to be happy, so I will as well! Merry Christmas! ZappaOMati 15:50, 25 December 2013 (UTC) |
- Hey ZappaOMati - thanks for the well-wishes. I wanted to ask you something - a possible article collaboration. What if, this year, we had articles entitled List of NFL Draft prospects at quarterback (and the other positions), where information on the top prospects' draft possibilities and analysis could go, and then after the draft, it could be transferred to 2014 NFL Draft Class at quarterback, with information on what actually happened. My only concerns are WP:NOT as well as where we draw the line at "draft prospect". Do you think it'd be worth the effort? Go Phightins! 16:54, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
- Sounds like an interesting idea; I'm trying to work on another project I have (making List of current National Football League head coaches like List of NFL starting quarterbacks by having short bios), though it does sound like a good idea, especially considering how small most players' draft profiles on their respective pages are. Though I somewhat agree on the possibility of violating WP:NOT, but since the draft pages can get rather long and could crash one's web browser (as it did for me at 2006 NFL Draft); as for prospect status, maybe we could write the analysis on the players that have declared for the draft beforehand and then write everyone else once the Combine takes place? However, probably my biggest concern is whether or not people with flag it for deletion as "trivial", though the info will most likely not be lost, since it would most likely get merged into the players' respective pages. Maybe my starting QB collab-partner Moe Epsilon could help out, considering he's usually the one that wrote the QB bios and dealt with templates and what-not over at List of NFL starting quarterbacks. I could ask the folks at WP:NFL for their advice, though my posts usually get ignored. If you ask me, I say be bold and go for it. ZappaOMati 17:31, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
- Let's also bring Toa Nidhiki05 into the discussion. Go Phightins! 04:49, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
- Sounds like an interesting idea; I'm trying to work on another project I have (making List of current National Football League head coaches like List of NFL starting quarterbacks by having short bios), though it does sound like a good idea, especially considering how small most players' draft profiles on their respective pages are. Though I somewhat agree on the possibility of violating WP:NOT, but since the draft pages can get rather long and could crash one's web browser (as it did for me at 2006 NFL Draft); as for prospect status, maybe we could write the analysis on the players that have declared for the draft beforehand and then write everyone else once the Combine takes place? However, probably my biggest concern is whether or not people with flag it for deletion as "trivial", though the info will most likely not be lost, since it would most likely get merged into the players' respective pages. Maybe my starting QB collab-partner Moe Epsilon could help out, considering he's usually the one that wrote the QB bios and dealt with templates and what-not over at List of NFL starting quarterbacks. I could ask the folks at WP:NFL for their advice, though my posts usually get ignored. If you ask me, I say be bold and go for it. ZappaOMati 17:31, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
Merry Christmas
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to you and yours. ```Buster Seven Talk 14:41, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 December 2013
- Recent research: Cross-language editors, election predictions, vandalism experiments
- Featured content: Drunken birds and treasonous kings
- Discussion report: Draft namespace, VisualEditor meetings
- WikiProject report: More Great WikiProject Logos
- News and notes: IEG round 2 funding rewards diverse ambitions
- Technology report: OAuth: future of user designed tools
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 06:39, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
A reference problem
Hi! Some users have been working hard on Category:Pages with broken reference names.
Here you added a new reference rice-def-stats but didn't define it. This has been showing as an error at the bottom of the article. "Cite error: The named reference REFNAME was invoked but never defined (see the help page)." Can you take a look and work out what you were trying to do? Thanks -- Frze > talk 10:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
Don't change again
| Payout = 2.4 million per team<ref>{{cite news|last=Higgins|first=Ron|title=AutoZone Liberty Bowl doubling payout in new deal with SEC|url=http://www.kitsapsun.com/news/2013/aug/13/autozone-liberty-bowl-doubling-payout-in-new-sec/#axzz2mpMJgamj|accessdate=December 7, 2013|newspaper=[[Kitsap Sun]]|date=August 13, 2013}}</ref>'''
- Hi, Frze. I am not sure what the second half of your comment (the "don't change again ..." part) means, but as for the first half, that was my fault ... I had defined the ref as "rice-def-stat", yet invoked it a few times as "rice-def-stats". Thank you for pointing it out. Now
Fixed. Go Phightins! 14:21, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
A Philly cheesesteak for you!
|
The Birds and the B's |
| I'm giving this to you for two reasons: 1. Congrats on Philly beating the Cowboys and making the playoffs; relieves my stress for 2014, since I'd rather see my Bears play the Cowboys than you guys. 2. Good work on the bowl games. I don't have ESPN, so I can't really track all these bowl games, and your work is pretty impressive. NFLisAwesome (ZappaOMati's alternate account) 17:15, 30 December 2013 (UTC) |
- Additionally, considering your draft prospect proposal doesn't seem to be going anywhere over at WT:NFL, I'd like to offer you a collaboration of my own. Looking at List of NFL starting quarterbacks, I was wondering if you'd be interested in assisting me create short biographies for head coaches over at List of current National Football League head coaches in the same fashion as the QB bios. If you're interested, I already started on one biography over at User:ZappaOMati/sandbox/2. NFLisAwesome (ZappaOMati's alternate account) 17:32, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
- Hi ZappaOMati, I was sweating it out at the end, but it was a lot of fun to watch. Unfortunately, I will be unable to watch the playoff game, as, for fun, I am cold-weather camping this weekend; six inches of snow coming soon to an area near me! (hopefully) Nevertheless, I hope we win; New Orleans will have to play in the snow, so stinks for them! As for your collaboration request, I read your Trestman bio, and think that there probably is not such a wealth of information available on all coaches' careers, assuming that each bio is exclusively on their coaching career, although that is completely unfounded, as I have not yet looked. I will be able to help you with that in a few months, perhaps, but in January, I am likely going to be working almost exclusively on bowl articles, trying, admittedly rather ambitiously, to get all of them to GA status. Go Phightins! 22:51, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Dear Go Phightins!
- Thank you, MusiCitizen, and no worries about forgetting to close the tag. I would have probably done the same thing :-) Go Phightins! 22:51, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Welcome to the 2014 WikiCup!
Hello Go Phightins!, and welcome to the 2014 WikiCup! Your submission page can be found here. The competition will begin at midnight tonight (UTC). There have been a few small changes from last year; the rules can be read in full at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring, and the page also includes a summary of changes. One important rule to remember is that only content on which you have completed significant work, and nominated, in 2014 is eligible for points in the competition- the judges will be checking! As ever, this year's competition includes some younger editors. If you are a younger editor, you are certainly welcome, but we have written an advice page at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Advice for younger editors for you. Please do take a look. Any questions should be directed to one of the judges, or left on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will make it to round 2. Good luck! J Milburn (talk · contribs), The ed17 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 17:32, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
To any talk page stalkers who will be awake for the next several hours - a moderately urgent request
I would greatly appreciate it if you would monitor Bill O'Brien. Right now, it is reported based on anonymous sources he has agreed to become the next head coach of the Houston Texans, which of course means swarms of people want to change his article. Official announcement has not yet come, so until then, it is just going to be like swatting flies on a hot summer day trying to keep it out of his article that O'Brien is currently the head coach of the Houston Texans. Any help in this endeavor would be appreciated, but for now, I must go to bed. Thank you in advance. Go Phightins! 04:38, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- Get some sleep! Happy new year. I'll be up and can keep an eye out. EricEnfermero HOWDY! 04:48, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Happy New Year Go Phightins!!
.jpg)
|
|
| Hello Go Phightins!: Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, ZappaOMati 16:59, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
|
The Signpost: 01 January 2014
- Traffic report: A year stuck in traffic
- Arbitration report: Examining the Committee's year
- In the media: Does Wikipedia need a medical disclaimer?
- Book review: Common Knowledge: An Ethnography of Wikipedia
- News and notes: The year in review
- Discussion report: Article incubator, dates and fractions, medical disclaimer
- WikiProject report: Where Are They Now? Fifth Edition
- Featured content: 2013—the trends
- Technology report: Looking back on 2013
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 06:20, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Signpost - in the news
Happy New Year and all that. Buzzfeed back on the Wiki trail this week with this - some of them are quite funny. Nthep (talk) 15:11, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 Penn State Nittany Lions football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Al Golden (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello
Hello Go Phightins!,
Hello again and sorry about the fall of your Eagles to the Saints. Anyway, do you mind giving me some idea of how I can make National Football League and Major League Baseball FA's? Sportsguy17 (T • C) 21:24, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Sportsguy; I am not terribly familiar with the FA process, so am not a great resource for you ... my only nomination failed. You may want to talk to Toa Nidhiki05, who brought NFL to GA status as to where he thinks it needs to go. He brought Carolina Panthers to FA status. Go Phightins! 17:13, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
WER
- Problem #1--- I changed the Template:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Project main page from Derek Bullamore to Neonblak. BUT...It does not seem to want to update at the WER/Eddy page, etc.
- Problem #2--- Although I have created Archive pages (#18 and #19) for the last two recipients in order install them in the Hall of Fame, they also do not appear.
Am I being "jinxed" because I didn't keep my New Years resolution???
- Problem #3--- I'm old and I forgot which one of your friendly stalkers helped me the last time. It's the editor that set up the archiving system at The Hall of Fame which has been working just fine until today. Thanks. ```Buster Seven Talk 00:57, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- I am not good enough with templates to figure this out. As for friendly stalkers, perhaps either Isaacl, Dainomite, Mark Miller, or Technical 13? Go Phightins! 01:08, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- Regarding the Editor of the Week page, looks like it was a problem with the Wikipedia server cache (basically, the servers did not realize the template had changed and did not generate a new version of the page). I visited https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Editor_Retention/Editor_of_the_Week?action=purge to force the page to be re-generated, and the problem seems to be resolved. isaacl (talk) 06:00, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- Did the same for the Hall of Fame page: I visited https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Editor_Retention/Editor_of_the_Week/Hall_of_Fame?action=purge to force the page to be re-generated. isaacl (talk) 06:06, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks, all! ```Buster Seven Talk 15:14, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
A Tesla Roadster to you!
|
A Tesla Roadster to you! |
| Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! Gg53000 (talk) 14:19, 9 January 2014 (UTC) |
DYK for 2013 New Mexico Bowl
 | On 11 January 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 2013 New Mexico Bowl, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Washington State lost fumbles twice in the last three minutes, allowing Colorado State to come back from a 15-point deficit to win the 2013 New Mexico Bowl 48–45? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2013 New Mexico Bowl. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:02, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 08 January 2014
- Public Domain Day: Why the year 2019 is so significant
- Traffic report: Tragedy and television
- Technology report: Gearing up for the Architecture Summit
- News and notes: WMF employee forced out over "paid advocacy editing"
- WikiProject report: Jumping into the television universe
- Featured content: A portal to the wonderful world of technology
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 09:02, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
Be careful!
See [3]. Watch out for road hazards. ```Buster Seven Talk 19:30, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:26, 14 January 2014 (UTC)