GeneM18

GeneM18, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi GeneM18! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:03, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Could you add the Tour Finals for Johanna Larsson as well please RaiffHowe (talk) 17:00, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, GeneM18. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Naomi Osaka WTA 125 chart

I'm not sure why you reverted on particular chart at Naomi Osaka away from Tennis Project guidelines? Fyunck(click) (talk) 18:41, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

The WTA 125 Series has its own sepecific section which is just like a Tier 1 finals or year end Finals or Grand Slam Finals table. I didn’t think those guidelines affected those? I have created a lot of those Finals tables especially for the lower ranked players who have reached either singles or doubles finals. A lot of players had been ignored so I created all the tables like that.

Hmmm. The guidelines aren't totally specific for the women on the WTA 125s. Probably since the guidelines were made before they created the WTA 125s. The WTA 125s are supposed to be equivalent to the upper tier of the men's challenger level events. Those men's tables are treated just like the ITF events and just like the guidelines for WTA finals. Those ITF and 125s are not part of the WTA Tour, the wins don't count for the WTA Tour. You have a point that it looks like the Tier 1 finals or grand slam finals tables, but we don't treat the mens minor league events that way. Plus, we do not use columns in the Tier 1 or Grand Slam sections like Outcome, No., or the full date (only the year), if it was done your way. Often the men's challenger table is blended with the ITF table, and we could certainly do the same with the ladies as we did with Chung Hyeon or like we do with Roger Federer. Fyunck(click) (talk) 22:26, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

It sure is a difficult one. The 125 Series certainly isn’t part of the wta tour but I also feel like it’s much bigger than any challenger event which is why it has its own table. I created those tables to look like the old style or should I say non standard WTA Finals chart because I thought it would be the simplest way to display the info. Also since it is a one tier section I did not think there was any need for the category column. As I said I noticed that the majority of players who had played in either singles but mostly doubles finals had no information added so I took it upon myself to create those tables, maybe I am wrong but someone had to add these details in order to keep articles up to date.

I'm glad you added them... it's a thankless job. I'll ask at the Tennis Project to see what people think... or maybe it's already been asked. Cheers. Fyunck(click) (talk) 23:03, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

I posted it at Tennis Project to see if anyone has some insight. Fyunck(click) (talk) 23:38, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Kontaveit

Don't edit war! And don't use we don't arguments because who are you. There is no rules that same tournament has to be on two rows. Better to go clutter free as general rules are. -Klõps (talk) 19:07, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Considering you are going against the general rule as seen on all other tennis players charts I believe you are wrong. No other player has a chart like that. I get that you have put a lot of effort into that page but I would rather have all the charts the same.

Stop edit warring x2! Main article has enough to have Grand slam results, if notable enough separate career statistics page will be created. Also the table is full of mistakes as an editor before your last undo pointed out. Klõps (talk) 15:47, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Signing your posts

Always sign Your posts with four tildes:~~~~. Read here:Wikipedia:Signatures. --Klõps (talk) 16:05, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, GeneM18. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

First winners

I am not sure ehy you are hostile to including the first winner in various GAA competitions. It is a normal feature in many articles.Pmunited (talk)

Hi, It isn’t consistent with other articles and adds unnecessary extra information into the info box. Current winner and Most successful is all that is necessary as compared to other sports. It would be very easy to find the first winner in the various tables provided in the articles.

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)