Lapping edit

Hi Gargoyle. I updated your description of lapping to describe equipment that is newer in technology than the piece you described. The addition of jig capability gives much more controlability over the amount (and speed) of material removed during a lapping process. I feel it is important to show readers that there are other variations of lapping machinery available and that the lapping process can be conducted in more than one method. If you feel strongly about keeping the existing image and descripton, why don't we have 2 desciptions available on the page, yours and mine? I am disappointed that you feel the need to revert the page back to a former state. Surely, the point of Wiki's is to update and add to content to keep it up to date?--User:DarrenSavery 21:49, 14 August 2006

Hi Gargoyle888 and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for improving Lapping. In order to make your image fit better into the text, you could have a look at Wikipedia:Image. Hope you will decide to stay here at Wikipedia--Betterworld 00:39, 18 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for that pointer. I think I've managed to fixed the image.--gargoyle888 04:39, 18 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

Wikiproject Metalworking edit

Hi, nice work on the various metalworking articles you've started or added to.

Wikiproject Metalworkingis a loosely organized effort to add consistency to the various metalworking pages lurking on wikipedia, have a look at the project page and see what you think, join if you want, use it for any questions or ideas you may have; but whatever you do, keep up the good work ;) — Graibeard 07:58, 6 November 2005 (UTC)Reply


NonBP revision edit

Thanks for the thanks. Mjformica 17:45, 25 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with Image:833-3.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:833-3.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Stan 15:07, 2 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Mechanical seal edit

Hi Gargoyle888, I think this page needs to be renamed to avoid confusion with other types of seals but I'm not sure what the best name would be. I've seen this design on heavy equipment axles with integral brakes where the manufacturer calls it a face seal. Anyway, could you comment at Talk:Mechanical seal with your preference? thanks --Duk 23:08, 31 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hello, can you move the picture to commons.wikimedia bacause I want to use it in de.wikipedia? It would be very nice. You can find me [here].

Non-BPD edit

Hi Gargoyle, dunno if you would considerajourning to article's talk page to try and thrash out a REAL article on this topic? If so I would be happy to change my "strong delete" to "neutral". --Zeraeph 23:39, 22 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Doesn't matter where you get your perspective from, you obviously have a fair and open mind regardless. Which is what this topic needs. --Zeraeph 04:38, 23 February 2007 (UTC)Reply


File source problem with File:2621-4.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:2621-4.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:49, 13 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILYsock (TALK) 06:49, 13 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks edit

Thanks for the barnstar...I appreciate it. And your expertise is more than welcome at Metalworking WikiProject. Wizard191 (talk) 03:39, 18 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Problems with upload of File:Gui4cli.gif edit

Thanks for uploading File:Gui4cli.gif. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:06, 19 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of P.J. Hoff edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on P.J. Hoff requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 00:00, 19 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Seal piping plans edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Seal piping plans requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Smileguy91Spread the knowledge! 20:21, 25 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Gargoyle888. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Gargoyle888. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Gargoyle888. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply