Fsavasta

Your submission at Articles for creation: N.D. (October 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:N.D. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 14:46, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Fsavasta! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 14:46, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Thank you! Can I have someone experienced do this publication for me? I'm getting a little old for all this. I meen, I'm willing to pay a fee for this service.

Thank you,

Fabio Fsavasta (talk) 14:58, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi Fabio, no, largely everything is done by volunteers and most often "firms" or free-lancers are scams so best to stay away from folks offering to write an article for a fee. As for the citations, you are close but you need to add them in the actual prose. For example, you need to add a citation to a reliable source that supports the statement Jankelson "is considered the father of the Neuromuscular Occlusion concept" and so forth. See my sandbox for a simple example. If you have questions or need help, you can ask at the Teahouse. S0091 (talk) 15:42, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for the information. The phrase "is considered the father of the Neuromuscular Occlusion concept" is cited on the ICCMO website. This phrase is endorsed by every member. Unless it a genetic (father) dna testing, it cannot be proved, correct? So I can edit to " is the developer of the Neuromuscular Occlusion concept". All the other references do state this and is ojective data. So why is stating to be the father of something not the same as creator? if so, the semantic limitations encountered in Wikipedia should all be subject to revision. Correct? Thank you for helping. What am I supposed to do now?

Fabio Fsavasta (talk) 15:52, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

The issue with the ICCMO is that he founded it so it is not an independent source which is what is needed to make such an exceptional claim and generally multiple are needed. I must ask, did/do you have any affiliation with Jankelson or the ICCMO? Please see the conflict of interest guidelines for additional details. Even if you do have a COI, that does not preclude you from working the draft but it must declared.

I have done some work on the draft (found some additional sources, etc.) but since I have no expertise in the area, I will need your help. Do you have access to medical journals (such as the Journal of the American Academy of Gnathologic Orthopedics)? S0091 (talk) 18:19, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bernard Jankelson (October 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bernard Jankelson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:26, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Bernard Jankelson

Hello, Fsavasta. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bernard Jankelson, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:04, 21 March 2023 (UTC)