Fredy.00

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Alaska worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:47, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Václav Klaus - Jr

A tag has been placed on Václav Klaus - Jr requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Falcon8765 (talk) 04:20, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Aryan Race. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. This image is the Nazi ideal only. It was inappropriate to present this as anything other.

Jiří Liška (statesman)

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Jiří Liška (statesman). Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Jozef_Tiso2.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Jozef_Tiso2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:19, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Urbanek-karel.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Urbanek-karel.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 22:05, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:Ivars Godmanis on left.JPG

File:Ivars Godmanis on left.JPG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Ivars Godmanis on left.JPG. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Ivars Godmanis on left.JPG]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 15:11, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:James F. Dobbins.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:James F. Dobbins.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 20:55, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Reda 2008.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Reda 2008.gif. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 11:55, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

File:Reda 2008.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Reda 2008.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 21:05, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Gottwald better.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gottwald better.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --(ESkog)^(Talk) 07:10, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Photolarge.strausz-hupe.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Photolarge.strausz-hupe.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --(ESkog)^(Talk) 07:13, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Adolfo-suarez.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Adolfo-suarez.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 07:15, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Václav Havel on stamp.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Václav Havel on stamp.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 07:18, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Sir alec douglas home 01.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sir alec douglas home 01.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 16:56, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Deletion discussions

Please do not remove links to active deletion discussions from image description pages or articles. This is considered vandalism. Instead, if you feel the media should be kept, you should comment on the discussion. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:51, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

• This is your final warning. If you continue to remove links to deletion discussions, instead of participating in the discussions, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. (ESkog)^(Talk) 17:23, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Milo Đukanović.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Milo Đukanović.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:51, 25 December 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:51, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Yves Leterme.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Yves Leterme.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:52, 25 December 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:52, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

:re

Allready done. Pozz--R ašo 22:44, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:Kazakhistan.idrissov.jpg

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Kazakhistan.idrissov.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:Kazakhistan.idrissov.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Kazakhistan.idrissov.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Kazakhistan.idrissov.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Kazakhistan.idrissov.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Kazakhistan.idrissov.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 17:04, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Blocked

As we discussed, you have been blocked for a short time for once again removing links to deletion discussions from image description pages. When your block expires, please consider participating in the discussions, rather than using vandalism to make your points. (ESkog)^(Talk) 17:41, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Karl Rasche

Hello Fredy.00. I corrected some parts in the acticle until I notices this looks like a copyright violation as it looks like a (not so good) translation of de:Karl Rasche. You are not the author of de:Karl Rasche and you even give no source for Karl Rasche, so this is IMHO a copyright violation. Please correct this. --Ausgangskontrolle (talk) 12:08, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Hello. This Edit you made in the article of United States was reverted because it wasn't sourced. If you wish to re-do this edit in the article, Please do add at least one reference. Thank you, Ricardo P. (talk) 16:57, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Accusations of political censoring

I'm not censoring your contributions. Just mentioning that if you insert this kind of info in articles that you should have reliable sources for them. The free speech amendment to the US constitution isn't valid for contributions on wikipedia even though it is based in the US. See: WP:FREE Jarkeld (talk) 17:13, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Three-revert rule warning

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on United States. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing.

Please make your case for any substantive changes you want to make in Talk. "Controversies" is not an acceptable section for a country article. In addition, the edits are written in very poor English, which you cannot expect other people to fix for you unless you convince us via the Talk page that the information is worthy of inclusion. DocKino (talk) 17:40, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Once again, please discuss your desired edits on the article's Talk page, not mine. Of course, it would help if you would first master the English language, as arguing about "true infromace" is not likely to get you far at all. DocKino (talk) 17:54, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Freedom of speech

I'll have you know that the Supreme Court of the United States has rule time and again that your First Amendment rights do not give anyone an obligation to provide a forum for your opinions.  Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 17:52, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at User talk:Blanchardb, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 18:24, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Warning...

Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Your persistent personal attacks against another editor, as well as your attempts to vandalize the WP article United States, will see you blocked if you continue. Your edit history exists as evidence, and I frankly don't like you trashing my country with your ill-conceived (and horribly spelled) rhetoric. Please stop - you have been warned... Doc9871 (talk) 18:29, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Blocked for edit-warring and personal attacks. --Golbez (talk) 18:43, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Please stop

Do not edit war to violate Wikipedia's policies on non-free content. If you continue, you will once again be blocked from editing. (ESkog)^(Talk) 22:43, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

• This is your final warning. If you continue to replace free images with non-free images in articles, you will be blocked from editing. (ESkog)^(Talk) 19:22, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Image of American and Soviet soldiers meeting

I reverted your change of the World War II image showing American and Soviet troops meeting. The one that was in the article was one I felt was more dynamic than the one you replaced it with. Unfortunately, I slipped and clicked on a Twinkle vandalism link instead of simply hitting "undo". Sorry about that! I do not consider your change to be vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 13:55, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Fredy.00! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 942 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Jiří Liška (statesman) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:59, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Gottwald_na_známce_NDR.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Gottwald_na_známce_NDR.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:18, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Spartakiad (Czechoslovakia)

The article Spartakiad (Czechoslovakia) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Machine translation from czech which is so badly done its unclear what the article is even about

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jac16888^Talk 17:26, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

January 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to 2010 Haiti earthquake. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Pontificalibus (talk) 19:02, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add uncited original research comments to 2010 Haiti earthquake. Please add sourced material from reliable sources. --Moni3 (talk) 19:10, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

"This natural disaster as soon as they abuse the United States as a pretext for the design of its military occupation of the island." What the hell does that even mean? You've been blocked before for similar "attempts" to discredited the United States with really, really bad original research. Looks like you'll be blocked again soon. Some people never learn... Doc9871 (talk) 19:14, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Last warning

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to 2010 Haiti earthquake, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:24, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for unsourced POV edits and personal attacks on other editors. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. JohnCD (talk) 19:51, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Bellamy salute

Hello, Fredy.00! I see you're back from your block, and right at it again with your NPOV edits. The picture you created for purposes of "satire" is fooling no one. You have been blocked twice for similar edits, and it will not be tolerated. I am strongly suggesting that you refrain from editing any article concerning the United States or Nazi Germany, or any perceived connection between the two. Not all of your edits are vandalism, and some are quite good (esp. when you focus on all things Czech). But, for some reason, you periodically feel the need to vandalize articles within a wide range, but all connected by your "themes". I am informally warning you without a template, which you seem to ignore anyway. Please Fredy.00, if you want to remain on WP, you must immediately stop the vandalism. I have documented your edits well, and if you put up one more contribution like the one you did today, you will be reported and probably blocked for a very long time. Think about it - it's not too late... Doc9871 (talk) 23:16, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

February 2010

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to 2010 Haiti earthquake. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Pontificalibus (talk) 17:26, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Source code

• Save the source code for the Haiti conspiracy page incase it gets deleted —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.184.58.114 (talk) 07:02, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with 2010 Haiti earthquake conspiracy theories, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Pontificalibus (talk) 17:34, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Deletion requests

Your request to have War on Terrorism‎ deleted was not proplerly carried out (you missed out a couple of stages) I have now rectified this but please read [[1]] in order to avoid this in future.Slatersteven (talk) 17:05, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Disruptive editing

You're going to be looking at an even longer block if you continue to violate WP:NPOV and WP:POINT. This is your last warning. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:30, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mw2-bug.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mw2-bug.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

• If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 04:01, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Gabčík.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gabčík.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:14, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Klement Gottwald - RO.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Klement Gottwald - RO.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:55, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Klement Gottwald - RO.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Klement Gottwald - RO.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --MGA73 (talk) 22:01, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:The place where Reinhard Heydrich was killed.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:The place where Reinhard Heydrich was killed.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 16:43, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dubček - fair use.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dubček - fair use.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 20:57, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Urbanek-karel.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Urbanek-karel.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 20:59, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Torcuato Fernández-Miranda.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Torcuato Fernández-Miranda.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:LifeErtegün.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LifeErtegün.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:33, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Thomas Niles.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Thomas Niles.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Wikiacc (¶) 21:44, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Grossman Press lrg.jpg

The file File:Grossman Press lrg.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Yasnov.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Yasnov.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:26, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Nachson Wachsman.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nachson Wachsman.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Nachson Wachsman.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nachson Wachsman.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 30 August 2020 (UTC)