Hello, Franciscos58, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! SwisterTwister talk 02:19, 3 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help


Teahouse logo
Hello! Franciscos58, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse, an awesome place to meet people, ask questions, and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Rosiestep (talk) 02:31, 7 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Labyrinth City for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Labyrinth City is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Labyrinth City until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dougweller (talk) 15:19, 21 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Ruins of Miraflores for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ruins of Miraflores is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruins of Miraflores until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dougweller (talk) 15:57, 21 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Ixiamas Fortress for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ixiamas Fortress is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ixiamas Fortress until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dougweller (talk) 16:09, 21 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Trinchera Fortress for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trinchera Fortress is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trinchera Fortress until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dougweller (talk) 16:11, 21 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Petroglyphs of Quiaca for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Petroglyphs of Quiaca is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Petroglyphs of Quiaca until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dougweller (talk) 16:12, 21 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Madeira Fortress for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Madeira Fortress is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madeira Fortress until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dougweller (talk) 16:18, 21 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits

edit

  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button   or   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:54, 26 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Yes. Please sign your comments. Also, you recently wrote
"It is true that when I created the article, for lack of time, I added only the source of..." "...anyway other sources can be added."
In the future, if you don't have time to find and add reliable sources, don't create the article. Otherwise your article will just be deleted, after wasting our time on the deletion discussion. Please read WP:V, WP:RS, and WP:COI. Thanks! --Guy Macon (talk) 14:11, 27 December 2012 (UTC)Reply