Finnyk

September 2016

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Boston Bruins, did not appear constructive and has been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Netdoge (talk) 01:28, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Lizard (talk) 03:10, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Recent edits to Norwood, Massachusetts

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Norwood, Massachusetts, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 01:30, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Julian Edelman. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Lor^Talk 02:21, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Recent edit to Mohamed Sanu

Hello. I noticed that you made an edit that introduces praise or promotional language to the Mohamed Sanu article. On Wikipedia, we adhere to a neutral point of view (NPOV) and avoid promotional language or puffery. Please read the NPOV policy page, as well as this page of language to avoid to better understand how to expand this article in a style suitable to an encyclopedia. If you have questions, please see the Help Desk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 02:56, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Recent edit to Norwood High School (Massachusetts)

Hello. I noticed that you made an edit that introduces praise or promotional language to the Norwood High School (Massachusetts) article. On Wikipedia, we adhere to a neutral point of view (NPOV) and avoid promotional language or puffery. Please read the NPOV policy page, as well as this page of language to avoid to better understand how to expand this article in a style suitable to an encyclopedia. If you have questions, please see the Help Desk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 11:41, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

December 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Daniel Carroll, you may be blocked from editing. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ Talk 18:34, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Norwood, Massachusetts, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ Talk 16:24, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

January 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Norwood High School (Massachusetts). Lizard (talk) 04:41, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 04:56, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 04:57, 15 January 2017 (UTC)