This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fbarbe (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am really not sure why I have been blocked, haven't edited in a while and today I was unable to make a minor edit from my phone.

Decline reason:

You personally are not blocked, that's for sure. What message do you see when you try to edit? Can you paste it here? And actually, if the IP or range you're on has been blocked, you might want to go to WP:IPECPROXY and see about request IP block exemption. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:41, 10 March 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ludii (September 22)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 19:57, 22 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Fbarbe! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 19:57, 22 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ludii (November 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Significa liberdade was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 20:01, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hi!
I'm contacting you as well (as well as the other reviewer), as I am feeling a bit stuck.
This is my first time creating a Wikipedia page, and it's starting to feel a bit frustrating to keep having it rejected without further feedback, despite having worked on the previous points. In particular, I saw that you have just rejected it with the same reasons as the previous two rejections. I have added sources from peer-reviewed journals and news articles, and rephrased part of the page to make it sound less like an advertisement. I have also asked for help
here
, but no one replied so far.
Could you point out some parts of the page that need to be changed, with some tips on what to focus on?
Thanks a lot for the work you do making Wikipedia the awesome place it is!
Fbarbe (talk) 21:55, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ludii (November 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Vanderwaalforces were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:20, 9 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
I'm posting this here (was previously posted in your user talk page)
Hi!
This is my first time creating a Wikipedia page, and it's starting to feel a bit frustrating to keep having it rejected without further feedback, despite having worked on the previous points. In particular, I saw that you have just rejected it with the same reasons as the previous two rejections. I have added sources from peer-reviewed journals and news articles, and rephrased part of the page to make it sound less like an advertisement. I have also asked for help here, but no one replied so far.
Could you point out some parts of the page that need to be changed, with some tips on what to focus on?
Thanks a lot for the work you do making Wikipedia the awesome place it is!
Fbarbe (talk) 21:51, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Ludii

edit

  Hello, Fbarbe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ludii, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:05, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply