EvertonFC19
| Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
| This is EvertonFC19's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
|
no archives yet (create) |
|
|
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit
Hello, Evertonfc13. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
May 2017 edit
Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Nikica Jelavić, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:39, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
Thank you, I much prefer the new layout, I find that easier to navigate also. Govvy (talk) 18:27, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Transfer Fees edit
Hi there,
Regarding the transfer value of Vito Mannone from Sunderland to Reading, surely it is better to use the official club release's than a third-party site that has a fee that is "reported to be"? --Dave logic (talk) 13:02, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Dave logic: The problem with that is that basically all of the fees are not disclosed by the clubs, so all of the fees would have to be erased. Also, the Sunderland 2017-18 wiki page and the Vito Mannone wiki page both use this source. Evertonfc13 (talk) 13:15, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Evertonfc13: I understand what you mean about all the fee's saying undisclosed, but if the clubs aren't officially announcing a fee then surely any fee listed is pure speculation? On Vito's page i think it's fine as the text says its "around" that value, which is backed up by linking to the BBC source. However on the Sunderland 2017-18 wiki page it shouldn't be listed a £2mil as the source used doesn't mention any value. --Dave logic (talk) 13:25, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Dave logic: I wouldn't call the BBC source "pure speculation", they are a pretty reputable source. Evertonfc13 (talk) 13:28, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Evertonfc13: well, yes the BBC is usually a reliable source, but my point is if neither clubs have disclosed the value of the transfer, then there is nothing official to confirm the value of the transfer fee. And whilst the BBC, SKY, ESPN etc. are usually reliable source they do sometimes get things wrong. An example of why I think adding transfer fees which aren't official stated by the club is shown here. Example I'd say the Teesside Gazette would be a good source for transfer info regarding Middlesbrough (in the same way Reading Post and Reading Chronicle can be for my team Reading) but the club coming out and correcting the transfer values they've stated shows that even with good sources in a club, they're not always correct.--Dave logic (talk) 13:44, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Dave logic: So would you rather have none of the amounts disclosed or trust the BBC? I believe the consensus has always been to use the BBC, but we can continue to discuss this on the talk page of the article to see if the consensus has changed. Evertonfc13 (talk) 14:29, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Evertonfc13: I don't see it as an issue of trust with the BBC or similar, more that you can't 100% guarantee that it's the correct figure unless it comes from the clubs involved. Also what happens in the case that neither club disclose the transfer fee and then two reputable source have differing values in their report of the transfer? There is also the question of where do you draw the line on sites being a reputable source? I understand where you're coming from, so more than happy to continue this on its talk page and see what the consensus is.--Dave logic (talk) 15:36, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Dave logic: I moved the discussion over the to talk page of the article. Evertonfc13 (talk) 19:35, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Evertonfc13: I don't see it as an issue of trust with the BBC or similar, more that you can't 100% guarantee that it's the correct figure unless it comes from the clubs involved. Also what happens in the case that neither club disclose the transfer fee and then two reputable source have differing values in their report of the transfer? There is also the question of where do you draw the line on sites being a reputable source? I understand where you're coming from, so more than happy to continue this on its talk page and see what the consensus is.--Dave logic (talk) 15:36, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Dave logic: So would you rather have none of the amounts disclosed or trust the BBC? I believe the consensus has always been to use the BBC, but we can continue to discuss this on the talk page of the article to see if the consensus has changed. Evertonfc13 (talk) 14:29, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Evertonfc13: well, yes the BBC is usually a reliable source, but my point is if neither clubs have disclosed the value of the transfer, then there is nothing official to confirm the value of the transfer fee. And whilst the BBC, SKY, ESPN etc. are usually reliable source they do sometimes get things wrong. An example of why I think adding transfer fees which aren't official stated by the club is shown here. Example I'd say the Teesside Gazette would be a good source for transfer info regarding Middlesbrough (in the same way Reading Post and Reading Chronicle can be for my team Reading) but the club coming out and correcting the transfer values they've stated shows that even with good sources in a club, they're not always correct.--Dave logic (talk) 13:44, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Dave logic: I wouldn't call the BBC source "pure speculation", they are a pretty reputable source. Evertonfc13 (talk) 13:28, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Evertonfc13: I understand what you mean about all the fee's saying undisclosed, but if the clubs aren't officially announcing a fee then surely any fee listed is pure speculation? On Vito's page i think it's fine as the text says its "around" that value, which is backed up by linking to the BBC source. However on the Sunderland 2017-18 wiki page it shouldn't be listed a £2mil as the source used doesn't mention any value. --Dave logic (talk) 13:25, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Page mover granted edit
Hello, Evertonfc13. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, and move subpages when moving the parent page(s).
Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.
Useful links:
- Wikipedia:Requested moves
- Category:Articles to be moved, for article renaming requests awaiting action.
If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:02, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
Samoa football team articles edit
You have used page mover rights to suppress redirects for 3 page moves, namely for the articles Samoa women's national football team, Samoa national under-20 football team, and Samoa women's national under-20 football team. I have created the redirects for you, but next time, please be careful and check to see whether redirect suppression is really appropriate. When in doubt, just leave the "leave redirect" box checked. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 15:35, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
UFC records and Strikeforce records edit
Just a quick question for you about the UFC fighters list using Strikeforce records. Isn't that only in effect for events after Strikeforce Challengers: Wilcox vs. Damm? That is the first Strikeforce event ran under Zuffa ownership and occurred on April 1, 2011. According to the top of the List of Current UFC Fighters page, that is when the records begin counting. If we are counting overall Strikeforce records, that is fine, but that would mean other fighters have incorrect records as it seems some records count all Strikeforce events and some only count the events from April 1, 2011 and on. Just wanted to get a clarification on this so I don't further mis-edit things. Brusinggiant (talk) 23:36, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Brusinggiant: It seems you are correct. When updating the records, just make sure you read the talk page and use the correct number so they can sort correctly. Cheers, EvertonFC13(talk2me) 15:22, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
List of UFC fighters edit
Hi Evertonfc13, thanks for informing. corrected.CASSIOPEIA (talk) 18:36, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit
Hello, Evertonfc13. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Thank you edit
|
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
| Hi Evertonfc13, thank you very much for sorting out List of current UFC fighters finghters' debut dates for all the weight categories and the contribution of the teamwork for MMA articles. Have a Wonderful and Happy New Year.CASSIOPEIA (talk) 07:45, 30 December 2017 (UTC) |
Your signature edit
Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.
You are encouraged to change
<span style="background: #274488;font-family: FF Angie">[[User:Evertonfc13|<font color="#FFFFFF">EvertonFC13</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Evertonfc13|<font color="#FFFFFF">(talk2me)</font>]]</sup></span>: EvertonFC13(talk2me)
to
<span style="background: #274488;font-family: FF Angie">[[User:Evertonfc13|<span style="color: #FFFFFF">EvertonFC13</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Evertonfc13|<span style="color: #FFFFFF">(talk2me)</span>]]</sup></span>: EvertonFC13(talk2me)
—Anomalocaris (talk) 22:13, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you for updating your signature! —Anomalocaris (talk) 10:06, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
List of current UFC fighters - fight calculation edit
Hi Evertonfc13, Greetings to you. I have added the fight calculation formulas into the "Notes/Key" section and have paid attribution to you - see here [1]. Thank you very much. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 23:53, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit
Hello, Evertonfc13. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Happy new year edit
|
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year 2019! |
|
Hi EvertonFC19, Sending you a warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019 and may this new year bring you joy and laughter. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 15:49, 13 December 2018 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
EvertonFC19, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit
|
Hi EvertonFC19! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:08, 5 March 2019 (UTC) |
Hey EvertonFC19, Greeting I have moved back the article to its original name as the official event name has not been updated on UFC.com yet. You are welcome to move it back when the event name is official. thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 01:43, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)