User talk:EverSince/Archive 2

New attempt to remove OccupyMARINES

Please forgive this unsolicited contact, but I note that a couple of weeks ago, you participated in a discussion at Wikipedia regarding the proposed deletion of their entry on OccupyMARINES. Of 26 respondents, 24 voted to Keep; only 2 voted Delete. The result was to Keep the article.

However, it has now been nominated again for deletion, and I thought you might be interested. Here's the URL for the new discussion page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Occupy_Marines_%282nd_nomination%29

JohnValeron (talk) 04:43, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Recovery model (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links to Stress and Case management

Mentalism (discrimination) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Mental

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	You did some good work summarizing research at Borderline personality disorder. Bearian (talk) 20:59, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

More information needed about File:Mark-David-Chapman-as-boy.jpg

Hello, EverSince!

It was really helpful of you to you to upload File:Mark-David-Chapman-as-boy.jpg. However, we need to properly format the image license information in order to keep and use new images.

If you can edit the description and add one of these templates, that would be great. If you're not sure how or would like some help, please ask us at the media copyright questions page and we'll be happy to assist you.

Thanks again! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:06, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 January 2012

• Interview: The Gardner interview

• News and notes: Things bubbling along as Wikimedians enjoy their holidays

• WikiProject report: Where are they now? Part III

• Featured content: Ghosts of featured content past, present, and future

• Arbitration report: New case accepted, four open cases, terms begin for new arbitrators

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 15:26, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Good idea

That's the best edit that's been made to Occupy Marines in a long time. I think it reads a lot better now. Good work. Basalisk ^{inspect damage}⁄_berate 05:16, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Thought I'd give it a go in that direction what with all the circling, thanks for the feedback and your peacemaking there... Every (talk) 06:18, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Came here to add my thanks as well, good effort on the rewrite. Wee Curry Monster talk 16:14, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Cheers, I kinda realised your point...I hope the others keep editing it if they're ok with it. Every (talk) 16:37, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Mental disorder

Just dropping by to complement you on the good job you're doing there. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 01:23, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi thanks it seemed like it needed some more work in some areas, am also wondering whether some of the longer subsections could do with being boiled down a bit... Btw I do tend to agree re the image issue, assuming an ideal one can't be found or isn't possible, also thought it best to wait for any other comments. Eversync (talk) 01:50, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 January 2012

• Technological roadmap: 2011's technological achievements in review, and what 2012 may hold

• News and notes: Fundraiser 2011 ends with a bang

• In the news: Wikipedia ends annual fundraising drive; Monmouthpedia launches

• WikiProject report: From Traditional to Experimental: WikiProject Jazz

• Featured content: Contentious FAC debate: a week in review

• Arbitration report: Four open cases, proposed decision in Betacommand 3

• Technology report: December in more detail; and why the MediaWiki codebase was "slushed" this week

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 04:06, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 January 2012

• Special report: English Wikipedia to go dark on January 18

• Sister projects: What are our sisters up to now?

• News and notes: WMF on the looming SOPA blackout, Wikipedia turns 11, and Commons passes 12 million files

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Beer

• Featured content: Lecen on systemic bias in featured content

• Arbitration report: Four open cases, Betacommand case deadlocked, Muhammad images close near

• Technology report: ArticleFeedback moves into new trial phase; and how MediaWiki integrates with Facebook, IPv6, and PostgreSQL explored

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 05:57, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 January 2012

• News and notes: SOPA blackout, Orange partnership

• In the news: World watched as Wikipedia shut down for SOPA blackout

• WikiProject report: The Golden Horseshoe: WikiProject Toronto

• Featured content: Interview with Muhammad Mahdi Karim and the best of the week

• Arbitration report: Four open cases, proposed decision in Muhammad images, AUSC call for applications

• Technology report: Looking ahead to MediaWiki 1.19 and related issues

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 18:11, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 January 2012

• News and notes: Update on Global Development, Wikipedia Day NYC is a success, JFK audio on Commons

• In the news: Zambian wiki-assassins, Foundation über alles, editor engagement and the innovation plateau

• Recent research: Language analyses examine power structure and political slant; Wikipedia compared to commercial databases

• WikiProject report: Digging Up WikiProject Palaeontology

• Featured content: Featured content soaring this week

• Arbitration report: Five open cases, voting on proposed decisions in two cases

• Technology report: Why "Lua" is on everybody's lips, and when to expect MediaWiki 1.19

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 03:13, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar

hi there, I often use wikipedia as a complement to scholarly articles when researching for work or my university studies, and as such came across the article 'Recovery-oriented practice' (or similar title). I work as a case manager in the mental health field and have attended many 'recovery model' training sessions in the course of my work. I found this article to be very well written, comprehensive, objective, and well-balanced, with an excellent list of references and sources used. I was so impressed I had to stop by here to compliment you on it, which is not something I have felt so moved to do before. The external links included were also a great read, particularly the critical analysis of recovery frameworks. Thank you very much for a fantastic contribution to the public! Cindy considine (talk) 13:38, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Hey thanks for stopping by, that's really good to know, particularly with your involvement in it. I think that might be a better name than recovery approach btw, though it seems tricky when it can be a very personal thing. Just noticed someone's made a Recovery Coaching too regarding addictions. Thanks again. Eversync (talk) 01:36, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 February 2012

• News and notes: The Foundation visits Tunisia, analyzes donors

• In the news: Leading scholar hails Wikipedia, historians urged to contribute while PR pros remain shunned

• Discussion report: Discussion swarms around Templates for deletion and returning editors of colourful pasts

• WikiProject report: The Eye of the Storm: WikiProject Tropical Cyclones

• Featured content: Talking architecture with MrPanyGoff

• Arbitration report: Four open cases, final decision in Muhammad images, Betacommand 3 near closure

• Technology report: October's coding challenge: results now in; progress on 1.19 steady; and why for a while interwiki links were no more

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 23:31, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Over and Out

Eversync (talk) 20:54, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

WB

Hello. You have a new message at Help talk:Introduction to talk pages's talk page. benzband (talk) 10:08, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Mark-David-Chapman-as-boy.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Mark-David-Chapman-as-boy.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:01, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Mark David Chapman in 1975.jpeg

Thank you for uploading File:Mark David Chapman in 1975.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:01, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Encourage

Template:Encourage has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Magioladitis (talk) 06:46, 19 June 2013 (UTC)