Hello Wiki users, my name is Enrique. I'm sorry for doing something wrong on that List of programs broadcast by Universal Kids page, I didn't know what happened. Enrique94834 (talk) 03:21, 24 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

January 2019

edit
 

Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at List of programs broadcast by Universal Kids. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Continued disruption will be met with being blocked from editing, or other sanctions. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. First of all, this isn't a place for you to post ramblings about stuff you made up. Second, even if it is indeed real, it isn't of note and as such we have the right to revert your edits. Consider starting a blog where you're free to post whatever you want; this is an encyclopedia, not a playground for you to post about those imaginary TV shows of yours. Blake Gripling (talk) 03:53, 24 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Enrique94834, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Enrique94834! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

April 2019

edit
 

Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Dot.. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Continued disruption will be met with being blocked from editing, or other sanctions. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. It is not your place who voiced who and who should've worked on a show. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 08:29, 20 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at ToddWorld, you may be blocked from editing. Orenburg1 (talk) 08:48, 20 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Dot.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- Scott Burley (talk) 02:07, 27 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

May 2019

edit
 

Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at List of programs broadcast by Universal Kids. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Continued disruption will be met with being blocked from editing, or other sanctions. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 23:26, 1 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of programs broadcast by Universal Kids. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 01:56, 8 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for 2 weeks

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 03:34, 17 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

June 2019

edit

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at List of programs broadcast by Disney Junior, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please STOP adding unsourced/dubious content to pages! How many times do we have to tell you this?!? ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 12:23, 4 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  N.J.A. | talk 13:33, 4 June 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Enrique94834 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have to be unblocked so I can edit some more. Enrique94834 (talk) 00:59, 29 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Further spurious appeals will result in your loss of talk page access. OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:19, 29 July 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Community Insights Survey

edit

RMaung (WMF) 16:29, 10 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

edit

RMaung (WMF) 15:37, 20 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

edit

RMaung (WMF) 20:38, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

November 2023

edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
-- ferret (talk) 22:29, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply