User talk:EmilySarah99/Archives/2024/January

Princess Alice, Countess of Athlone edit

Hi, EmilySarah99. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, your enthusiasm is an important part of what keeps the project moving forward. This was not vandalism, nor a series of misplaced sandbox experiments, and the edit summaries explain that. To expand beyond the short edit summaries: per MOS:LEAD and {{nvb}}, the lead section is a summary of more expansive key information that is found in the body of the article; there was no mention of the longevity item in the body of the Princess Alice, Countess of Athlone article, which is why it has now been added. If you would like to edit the wording added to the body, always feel free to do that - I am first to admit that my words are never a thing of beauty. The MOS:ENTO edit is a simple housekeeping item; again, no need for a longer edit summary. None of this is vandalism, none of this is a WP:RW situation. Jmg38 (talk) 14:15, 1 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

User:Jmg38,
The revert of the edit had nothing to do with the lead section of the article, it had to do wit the caption of the photo in the infobox (While chatelaine of Rideau Hall (portrait c. 1940 – c. 1946)) which is reserved for details of the author and year of the photograph. When viewed in context of your other edits, I am able to see that this was a good faith edit and not vandalisim, though the edit summary did little to explain this, "(caption)".
EmilySarah99 (talk) 03:25, 2 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for January 5 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leopold I, Duke of Austria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Albert I.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 5 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Maria (wife of Boris I of Bulgaria) edit

Hello, could you explain how adding a relevant and existing category on the page Maria (wife of Boris I of Bulgaria) is an unconstructive edit. Similar categories (for the right century) are present in other articles of Bulgarian consorts, such as Kira Maria Asenina of Bulgaria, Maria Palaiologina Kantakouzene, Maria-Irene Palaiologina, etc. Thank you. --Gligan1 (talk) 11:57, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello Gligan1! At the time, I was working through my watchlist and was intending to revert the typo 'woman' to 'women'. Upon revision, I now notice that it is the other way around, and you had already ammended the error. I'm sorry for the confusion, I clearly need to pay more attention. I've added readded the category now. Happy editing! EmilySarah99 (talk) 12:21, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. I have just corrected a typo of your readdition. Happy editing to you, too. --Gligan1 (talk) 12:35, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red edit

Hi there, EmilySarah99, and thank you for your many biographies of historical women, especially those from Russia. Your editing is of a high standard but if you have not already done so, you might find it useful to look through our Primer. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 10:51, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red January 2024 edit

 
 
Women in Red | January 2024, Volume 10, Issue 1, Numbers 291, 293, 294, 295, 296


Online events:

Announcement

  • In 2024 Women in Red also has a one biography a week challenge as part
    of the #1day1woman initiative!

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

  Facebook |   Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Ipigott (talk) 10:51, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started edit

Hello, EmilySarah99. Thank you for your work on Sofia Andreevna Gagarina. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:26, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Children of Alexis of Russia edit

 

Hello, EmilySarah99. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Children of Alexis of Russia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:55, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started edit

Hello, EmilySarah99. Thank you for your work on Sofia Ivanovna Tyutcheva. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:02, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Picture (Tatiana) edit

Hello, new user here. I apologize because I am not familiar with how consensus is reached among editors. In my opinion, the Fabergé picture shows Tatiana's face more clearly and makes her features standout while the current portrait has half of her face covered in shadows. I also tried to put pictures that are not from the same year (for example, the first 2 photos we see are both from 1914 so I put one from 1910 while moving the other down the article). Thank you for your review and I hope to hear from you soon. Minephases (talk) 10:30, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

With an article of such quality and popularity, you would be better off discussing changes in the talk page to discuss with other editors before making such changes. No worries, we all learn somewhere. EmilySarah99 (talk) 10:41, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red February 2024 edit

 
Women in Red | February 2024, Volume 10, Issue 2, Numbers 293, 294, 297, 298


Online events:

Announcement

  • Please let other wikiprojects know about our February Black women event.

Tip of the month:

  • AllAfrica can now be searched on the ProQuest tab at the WP Library.

Other ways to participate:

  Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:08, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

I have sent you a note about a page you started edit

Hello, EmilySarah99. Thank you for your work on Ekaterina Adlerberg. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:57, 29 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Dollar Princesses edit

 

Hello, EmilySarah99. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dollar Princesses".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. plicit 14:14, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started edit

Hello, EmilySarah99. Thank you for your work on Euphrosyne Yaroslavna. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:11, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply