Emanuelrodriguez232

Nomination of Peter J. Wacks for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter J. Wacks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter J. Wacks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:24, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello! I would like to know why this article should be deleted, what are the guidelines being broken or not followed correctly? I would love to solve these issues, The page has merit of existing (please see the many empty wikipedia links pointing to it) Emanuelrodriguez232 (talk) 05:04, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Emanuelrodriguez232! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, A couple of questions from a new contributor, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 30 June 2022 (UTC)