EamonX1

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at User:EamonX1/sandbox.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

• Please remember to link to the submission!

• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

APerson (talk!) 14:52, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello! EamonX1, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! APerson (talk!) 14:52, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

I re-did the article well over a week ago and hoped it would be vetted as to whether the copyright issue is resolved. I deleted all direct quotation and tried reproduce the article without obvious paraphrase. Can someone tell me its present status. The volunteer who initially raised the copyright issue and removed most of the text from the Article had put in a note that he/she was doing exams and would not be around for a while. I tried to contact the person, but must have gone about it the wrong way - the whole thing is so so complicated my head is spinning. The revised version is to be found at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Alfred_Edwin_Jones/Temp

EamonX1 (talk) 20:12, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

If you fixed the copyright issue and rewrote the content in your own words, you're welcome to add it to the article itself. You may want to do some copyediting, though. Some issues I noticed:

• Wikipedia uses boldface extremely sparingly, with the article's title in the first sentence usually the only example. I'd also remove some of the italics, particularly for names of people.
• Some of your "&" seem to be broken; it appears you have spaces in the HTML code. I think you can just use regular "&" without a need for that HTML.
• You may want to check out WP:Referencing for beginners, particularly the section on re-using a reference. "Ibid." could become problematic if someone adds content - with a reference - between the "ibid." and the reference it refers to, for example. I found some other references rather unhelpful; for example, I couldn't tell what "Scot, Michael (ed. O’Regan)53" is. I assume it's page 53 of some book, but without the title I don't think I could find it.
• When you want to cite multiple sources for the same statement, it's usually preferred to either add one footnote for each source, or to use a bulleted list (see WP:BUNDLING on that). I found it rather difficult to tell where in references 4 or 13 one source ends and the next one begins.

Thanks for cleaning up the copyright issue; happy editing! Huon (talk) 20:34, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Now that is really helpful for me and I will get cracking on it right away. Appreciated much. EamonX1 to Huon

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, EamonX1. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by – Margin1522 (talk) 20:09, 18 December 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Help me!

Please help me with adding references to an article. I submitted an article with only one reference and it was rejected because of lack of references. I have now gone into my Sandbox and added in several additional references. However when I press the REVIEW button the new references do not appear as numbers in the text and footnotes below. Instead the code >ref> the text of the reference and the code <ref> appear in the body of the article, while the original single reference appears correctly as a number in the text and as a footnote at the end of page. I must be doing something wrong. I have the URL in Wikipedia sandbox which will show you exactly my problem. But I dont want to give it here without somebody asking me for it. I have also copied the page from the Sandbox which I re-edited and for which I pressed the REVIEW button. I can also send this to anyone who might help. You will see exactly the re-edited version. I'm badly stuck

Eamonn Hogan (EamonX1)

Hello EamonX1! You don't quite have the reference formatting right. The format is <ref>Text of citation</ref>. The first reference is correct, but for the others you have <ref>Text of citation<ref> (note the missing closing /). Inserting a / in the closing tag of each reference should fix the issue. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 00:54, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

(edit conflict):It looks like you didn't close the ref tag properly, to close the ref tags you need to have the slash in the last one like </ref>. I have gone ahead and fixed the ref issue in your article. However there may still be some issues. I am not a reviewer for Article for Creation so they may be able to help more when you ask for your next review.- McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 00:59, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alfred Edwin Jones has been accepted

Alfred Edwin Jones, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:22, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

MV helpdesk reply

Hello, EamonX1. You have new messages at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#12:38:47.2C_9_February_2015_review_of_submission_by_EamonX1.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Copyright problem: Alfred Edwin Jones

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Alfred Edwin Jones, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.dia.ie/architects/view/2841/JONES+%26+KELLY, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Alfred Edwin Jones and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Alfred Edwin Jones, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Alfred Edwin Jones. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Alfred Edwin Jones with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Alfred Edwin Jones saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Darylgolden^(talk) Ping when replying 03:09, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Help me, please!

Please help me with...This is about the copyright issue raised about my article: ALBERT EDWIN JONES: I thought I had referenced all material used in the article (from published sources). Nonetheless the issue of breaching copyright has been raised and I must deal with it. I have contacted the Dictionary of Irish Architecture and obtained permission from the editors to quote the material. I sent an email to the permissions address given in Wikipedia instructions informing them of this and copying the letter of permission. I also sent a message to the person who reviewed the article, raised the copyright issue and removed material from the page. I have received NO acknowledgement or reply to any of this. I want some help to get my page back up and running. I have the permissions required. I emailed a copy to Wilipedia. I contacted the person who raised the issue to tell him / her what I have done. If I have to fine-tune the article adding quote marks where they might inadvertently have been omitted, I have no problem with doing this. But I am over 70 and need guidance on this EamonX1 EamonX1 (talk) 19:56, 19 March 2015 (UTC) EamonX1 (talk) 19:56, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello EamonX1, copyright is a rather tricky issue. To be usable on Wikipedia, the content must have been released under a free license that allows everybody to re-use and modify it for any purpose, including commercial purposes. If only you have received permission to use it, that won't suffice. Even if only Wikipedia receives permission to use it, Wikipedia will still consider the content non-free and will not use it (even though it technically could) because Wikipedia aims to be freely re-usable, and having copyrighted non-free content would compromise that goal.

Darylgolden, the editor who added the copyright tag, replied to your messages here, explaining Wikipedia's default choice of free license, and again here. Talk pages on Wikipedia should have the oldest messages at the top; thus Darylgolden moved your messages down to a new section near the bottom of the page before replying; I assume that's why the replies got lost.

The people dealing with the permission emails are volunteers too; while I do not have access to that email queue, I hear there's a backlog. Please be patient. Even if the article should be deleted because the copyright issue isn't resolved in time, that wouldn't be a problem; the page can be undeleted again once the copyright issue has been dealt with.

A quicker approach may be to not bother with the licensing at all but to rewrite that section from scratch and to summarize in your own words what the sources say without copy-pasting the content. Quoting the sources would only be necessary if we quote someone's personal opinion, say an art critic's assessment of the artistic quality of Alfred Edwin Jones' work, and we don't want to put words into that person's mouth - the Michael Scott quote would be one such example. (As an unrelated aside, the link for Scott pointed to the disambiguation page Michael Scott, not to the article Michael Scott (architect) on this Michael Scott. The code to link to the right article and still display "Michael Scott" is [[Michael Scott (architect)|Michael Scott]], a so-called "piped link".) Huon (talk) 20:46, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Help me!

Please help me with my article on Alfred Edwin Jones. I am not sure what is happening to it now. I re-did the article after issues of copyright were raised. I would do more work if necessary, but I have heard nothing about my revised article. It can be found at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Alfred_Edwin_Jones/Temp... Edmund Hogan (EamonX1) EamonX1 (talk) 19:29, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

You should return to the talk page of the main article, Talk:Alfred Edwin Jones, and discuss the matter with the OTRS member there who was helping. Also the editor who originally removed the copyrighted content. It's best to stick with the same group of editors, reviewers, and administrators that are familiar with the issues. —    Bill W.    (Talk)  (Contrib)  (User:Wtwilson3)  — 13:48, 8 April 2015 (UTC)