Hello ECPR823! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! BlindEagletalk 15:57, 26 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous


Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising in articles. For more information on this, see

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome!

CU@A edit

Hello. I just want you to know that I was the one who tagged your Concordia University at Austin article and nominated your Accelerated Degree Program article for speedy deletion under Wikipedia's Spam policy. I appreciate the effort you've obviously put into both articles, even taking time to learn how to use Wikilinks, images, infoboxes, photo galleries-- you've put togetehr a polished-looking article. However, neither article conforms to Wikipedia's philosophy of Neutral Point of View, in which glowing reports about anything at all are discouraged. The Accelerated Degree Program article is considered an advertisement and an inappropriate topic for an encyclopedia. I will take some time later to modify your Austin article so that it sounds more neutral. Feel free to leave me a message about any of this. Fishal 21:08, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

I also want to add that I hope you don't feel like you have been bitten in the head the moment that you set foot here. As I said, the Austin article is great; it's just not written in the tone that Wikipedia articles are expected to be written in. If you want to take another look at it and make it more neutral-sounding, please do. Fishal 12:45, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

I added some suggestions, and rewrote a paragraph as an example. Watch out for copyright. (and individual programs are rarely considered notable enough for their own articles.) The present article is just the start. DGG 22:28, 13 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Help Me 1 edit

Thank you for the advice. There was also a comment on the talk page that said something about the photographs I'm using. They are mine and I think that the licensing I placed them under is correct. Please let me know if anything needs to be changed so that they don't get deleted. I am creating this page for Concorida University at Austin per their request. I'd like to get it done right so that it will no longer be under threat of deletion. Thanks. ECPR823 22:54, 14 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Per policy], advertising corporations on Wikipedia is disallowed. Real96 23:49, 14 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

What Real96 means is that it was probably inappropriate for the college to commission you to write an article about them. Wikipedia should not be used to promote yourself. However, there is nothing at all wrong with having an article about the school-- as long as it's written in the correct tone, which it is now, I think. The problem originally was that you used language that was complementary rather than strictly neutral. I think that it's pretty much fixed now. I have no idea why people raised copyright issues with your pictures or images; my guess is that it's because you're a new user who has contributed only to one or two articles, and most new users of this kind lack the technical skills and dedication that you've shown; they steal images from websites rather than taking pictures for themselves. Obviously, if they had bothered to look at the description pages, they would have seen that they are your personal pictures.

Once again, I really hope that you don't feel like you've been "bitten;" you obviously have a lot to offer to Wikipedia and I'd hate for you to go away disgruntled. Your article puts to shame the one I wrote on my alma mater, Concordia University Chicago.

Sincerely, Fishal 20:03, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

PS: Is Concordia paying you to write the articles? Fishal 12:19, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

No they are not, I volunteered ECPR823 17:43, 17 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

OK, good. (That's a pretty big violation of policy.) There should be no problem, then: just keep up the good work. Fishal 19:50, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

{{help me}} Concordia University at Austin has changed its name effective today, July 2, 2007, to Concordia University Texas. Could you please change the title of this article to Concordia University Texas or tell me how to. I have already updated the name change within the body of the article. Thank you. ECPR823 18:22, 2 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Please provide a reliable source on the talk page of the article before moving the page. Miranda 18:26, 2 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Concordia University at Austin Logo.jpg) edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Concordia University at Austin Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:57, 4 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree Image:Cedel.jpg edit

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Cedel.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- RG2 06:45, 4 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Concordia University at Austin Aerial View of Northwest Campus 1.JPG listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Concordia University at Austin Aerial View of Northwest Campus 1.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- RG2 06:53, 4 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Images listed for deletion edit

Some of your images or media files have been listed for deletion. Please see Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion if you are interested in preserving them.

Thank you. -- RG2 06:59, 4 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Notification of automated file description generation edit

Your upload of File:Concordiaoldfacultypic.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:03, 22 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply