Hello, Dstoli1770, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Dirk Beetstra T C 16:18, 20 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Your edits

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you.

Moreover, most of the information that you are including is not suitable for Wikipedia, we are not writing a linkfarm. Please read through the policies and guidelines linked from the above templates, and reconsider your edits. --Dirk Beetstra T C 16:18, 20 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

My apologies, I am not trying to have an edit war with you. I am stopping all edits. Please do what you have too. I am not familiar with this process and am researching wikipedia rules to be informed so as not to break the rules. I will hand off this project to Vanbros.com who are agents for Alexis. They initially set this up. I was just trying to assist with adding the information. I hope Vanbros.com knows what they are doing. I'm done. Thank you, David.

Then they for sure have a conflict of interest, and should not be editing the page directly. --Dirk Beetstra T C 19:12, 20 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

I understand now. Alexis and I will not intentionally violate your CIO policy and Vanbros.com will not be allowed to edit the page. The Biography posted by me was directly emailed to me by Alexis Railsback just minutes before I placed it on the page, at her request. I will explain the Alexis that only she is to be editing her information and that for anyone else to do so is a COI. Please bring to my attention anything else Alexis or I should be aware of so as not to violate the Wikipedia rules or policies. I will continue to research the rules to assist Alexis in what is and is not permitted. Thank you, David

3RR

edit

I am going to ask you to undo your own edits per the following warning:

 

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

You have reinstated, without discussion or anything, links and galleries that have been removed more than 3 times by now. Those links and galleries are inappropriate in this way per our policies and guidelines. --Dirk Beetstra T C 18:52, 20 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dstoli1770 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I acknowledge my mistakes due to my complete ignorance of how Wikipedia operates. I was not intentionally trying to engage in Abusing Multiple Accounts. I was not logged in one time when I tried to add first party references to Alexis Railsback's page and correct her height on Miss USA's page, at Alexis's request, so my personal IP 162.239.190.243, which is me, Dstoli1770, was blocked. As stated in my exchange with administrators, I am the uncle of Alexis. I do not work for any pageant and have no business conflict of interest due to my employer. Everything I am posting is directly at the request of Alexis Railsback because she does not know how to code. I am trying to learn your policies and guidelines, which are enormous. I have never intentionally broke your rules. I never realized my edits were being removed as I pasted new code to replace the old code thus being accused of Edit Wars. I was not even looking at any talk as it was happening in real time. I now understand that I am to always be logged in when editing anything on Wikipedia. I also am more aware of watching for messages as I am working on my edits so I am not oblivious to my mistakes as the are happening. Thank you for helping me understand your guidelines. Dstoli1770 (talk) 16:19, 19 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

I'd be prepared to unblock on the basis that you don't directly edit the article, and only edit logged in. Do you accept these conditions? PhilKnight (talk) 19:35, 19 January 2015 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Dstoli1770 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Yes. I accept the conditions that I do not directly edit the article, and only edit logged in. Thank you. Dstoli1770 (talk) 00:44, 20 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Accept reason:

Unblocked with agreed conditions. PhilKnight (talk) 17:53, 20 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

@HJ Mitchell: - what do you think about unblocking this user? Possibly unblock on the condition he doesn't directly edit the article, and only edits logged in? PhilKnight (talk) 16:30, 19 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Fine with me if they agree to those conditions. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:37, 19 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. PhilKnight (talk) 19:33, 19 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Blocked

edit

I've blocked this account as the user did not comply with the unblock conditions. PhilKnight (talk) 20:18, 15 April 2015 (UTC)Reply