Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicky Palmer (August 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by SamHolt6 was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Obvious hoax or vandalism
SamHolt6 (talk) 00:38, 13 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Dr. jeramiah Laden! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SamHolt6 (talk) 00:38, 13 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Nicky Palmer

edit
 

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Nicky Palmer, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pi (Talk to me!) 02:07, 13 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Nicky Palmer

edit
 

Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Nicky Palmer. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pi (Talk to me!) 02:07, 13 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Nicky Palmer

edit

I just looked at your contribution history, and it seems like you made a decent contribution to Polish–Lithuanian occupation of Moscow before making a silly draft at Draft:Nicky Palmer. Since you clearly know how to edit, and you know how to use Wikitext, why not try and make some positive contributions? It could be fun, I promise. Perhaps a good place to start is Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Adventure, which is a fun introduction to how Wikipedia works, and if you have any questions you can ask for help at Wikipedia:Teahouse, or if you're looking for places to get started feel free to send me a message at User_talk:Pi. Pi (Talk to me!) 02:18, 13 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

August 2020

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Summer of the Seventeenth Doll has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:04, 27 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   --Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:16, 27 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Unblock discussion

edit

Please see zero-tolerance revdel'd edits to Summer of the Seventeenth Doll (1959 film) --Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:21, 27 August 2020 (UTC)Reply