Nomination of Alp Allen Altiner for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alp Allen Altiner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alp Allen Altiner until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:15, 3 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Alp Allen Altiner

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Alp Allen Altiner requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dricherby (talk) 12:32, 3 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • DO NOT recreate deleted pages without addressing the issue that caused them to be deleted. The recreated version of Alp Allen Altiner is still copy-pasted from his website. I have tagged it again and it will be deleted again. This is your final warning: if you continue to violate copyright, your account will almost certainly be blocked. Dricherby (talk) 18:39, 3 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit

Wikipedia cannot hold copyright material, not even temporarily. Assertion of permission to use text is not enough. Please read Wikipedia:Copy-paste.

Even if the copyright issue were resolved, material copied from company or personal websites is likely to be written in a promotional tone unsuitable for an encyclopedia article, which requires a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not a noticeboard for pinning up copies of promotional material.

Article subjects need to have notability, which is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." There is more information at WP:Notability (people), especially the section WP:ARTIST, and good advice on how to write an acceptable article at WP:Your first article. JohnCD (talk) 20:30, 3 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Dota2turbo

edit

Hello Dota2turbo,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged User:Dota2turbo for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was previously deleted by a consensus decision.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Adavis444 (talk) 20:29, 2 August 2013 (UTC)Reply