Doonagatha

Doonagatha, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Doonagatha! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Osarius (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Template:Australian National University

Hi, just to let you know why I reverted your additions to this template. Per WP:NAVBOX guidelines, navboxes are intended for navigation between articles, therefore they don't have redlinked or non-existing articles. I kept the colleges as maybe the will be created in the future if they are happen to be notable subgroups of the university. Thanks Aloneinthewild (talk) 11:06, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Doonagatha. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Murph9000 (talk) 16:16, 17 September 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Instant-runoff voting Good Article Nomination

Hi! I see you nominated Instant-runoff voting as a good article. I have a few concerns. First, it does not appear that you have contributed to the article. If you have not contributed to an article, the Good Article criteria suggests checking with longtime editors of the page before nominating. Second, it looks to me like the article needs a lot of work with sourcing. I count 4 citation needed tags and there are several other paragraphs with no citations at all. Citations would need to be added before this article could pass a good article review. I think if you would like to have this article reach Good Article status you will want to do significant work on the citations. Best of luck to you! Knope7 (talk) 02:30, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Instant-runoff voting

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Instant-runoff voting you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 05:01, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Instant-runoff voting

The article Instant-runoff voting you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Instant-runoff voting for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 22:41, 13 May 2017 (UTC)