We'd like to keep working on it and feel that in November when the book is released Mr. Patten will have increased notability in the media. Thank you.

Your submission at Articles for creation: J.T. Patten (June 12) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Calliopejen1 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:56, 12 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, EscapeYourRealityPress! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:56, 12 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

August 2018 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "EscapeYourRealityPress", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it appears to be the name of a publisher, implying shared use. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing this form, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 21:11, 11 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

I understand the confusion, and it has been changed. Thank you

Your submission at Articles for creation: J.T. Patten (February 26) edit

 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DGG was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: and article is entirely promotional, for this self-published author.
DGG ( talk ) 07:07, 26 February 2019 (UTC)Reply


You asked for details. First, about the promotionalism (promotionalism of his novels as an author, or promotional of his lecturing & writing as a security expert:
"globally recognized expert" ; "notable authority"  ; the entire government disclosure" section, which is boilerplate emphasising the general theme, that his books are significant because he has the correct intelligence background.
the reliance on ICWatch, quoting from [1] " e have collected over 100,000 of these resumes from LinkedIn, Indeed, and other public sources and made them searchable with our search software" -- in other words, it is just a compilation of his own resumes for himself, and thus unreliable.
The entire article is overemphasis on his qualification, and is thus appropriate for his personal website, not an encyclopedia article.

Second, about notability as an author of fiction. His one non self-published book has a total of 6 copies inUS libraries. I havent checked for reviews, butI doubt there would be any; hisself published books appear to be in no libraries at all. As for notability asa intelligence specialist, it'sharder to judge,but ifwe are going to use the standards of WP:PROF for the published papers, they are many too few and have vey few citations.

But there is something even more important: WP:COI, considering this is the only article you have worked on, and considering your earlier username, If there's any financial connection with him or his agent or his publisher, or if you work for any of these, you absolutely must declare it according to WP:PAID. DGG ( talk ) 23:06, 12 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

I feel that I am at an impasse writing this up. It meets criteria and is very similar to other notable authors and public figures on Wikipedia. Seems the rejection is biased an unfounded if you look at other thriller authors. Of course it will look like promotion because most interviews,articles, etc are the author being requested by media and reviewers about their work. Mr. Patten isn’t just an author, he is a recognized expert in counterterrorism and intelligence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.4.230.147 (talk) 15:17, 23 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:J.T. Patten edit

 

Hello, DonovanBlack6. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "J.T. Patten".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! 大诺史 (talk) 14:33, 23 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:JT Patten Books Logo.png edit

 

The file File:JT Patten Books Logo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 26 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:JT Patten Photo.jpg edit

 

The file File:JT Patten Photo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 27 November 2019 (UTC)Reply