The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
For providing high quality Coat of Arms for the new Greenland divisions.
Qaasuitsup, Qeqqata, Sermersooq, Kujalleq

File:Índia Portuguesa.png listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Índia Portuguesa.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 09:29, 20 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Tião Carreiro & Pardinho.PNG missing description details edit

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Tião Carreiro & Pardinho.PNG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

FC Independente edit

Portuguese Wikipedia templates and infoboxes don't work here. Please edit in English. Woogee (talk) 02:45, 13 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Botafogo_F.R..PNG) edit

  Thanks for uploading File:Botafogo_F.R..PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 05:28, 27 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Chapter Administration in Dili edit

  Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Dili, you will be blocked from editing. J. Patrick Fischer (talk) 13:56, 21 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

  This is the final warning you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Dili, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. J. Patrick Fischer (talk) 14:03, 21 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

3RR Rule edit

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 14:17, 21 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Edit war at Dili edit

User:189.41.242.19 \ User:Domeleixo edit

User J. Patrick Fischer (talk) is removing systematically the symbols of the city alleging they are not used anymore. The problem is that he doesn´t quote any relevant source to remove the symbols and prove they are not used anymore, despite there´s a law supporting them. I gave the data, he is disputing it, just for personal taste. You are being partial. His editions are the ones to be avoided. Emerson Domaleixo (talk) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.41.242.19 (talk) 14:22, 21 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

I am not a party in this dispute, and my only concert here is the violation of WP:3RR. However i do notice that your [1] are taking out several references at the same time, with no real explanation. Furthermore i would advice you to log in while making these edits, as using an IP instead of your account could draw WP:Sockpuppet suspicion onto you. Also, please keep cool. Editing while being angry or annoyed with someone is generally a bad idea; Instead of reverting each other over and over you should discuss the issue on the article talk page. If you cannot seem to solve it, please use Dispute resolution to come to a consensus. With kind regards, Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 14:41, 21 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

User:J. Patrick Fischer edit

Hello Excirial. I requested for several times for help, but nothing happend. I asked for a third oppinion, I announced the edit war and I announced the vandalism of User:Domeleixo. The discussion at the talk page is about the CoA and flag of Dili, but Domaleixo is deleting the sourced chapter about the Administration, too, although I warned him. Anyhow, Domaleixo is insulting the other users in the discussion. There are three against his sole oppinion. There is high time for an administrator to stop him. --J. Patrick Fischer (talk) 14:30, 21 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Even so reverting each other over and over will not solve the issue as the other user can do the exact same thing. I listed the page for protection so that the edit war will at least temporally be stopped. I see the Third opinion request was added just a few hours ago. Wikipedia tends to turn rather slowly in the weekend, so give it some time. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 14:41, 21 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
Please stop making anonymous reverts against the consensus on the issue of the flag. I am reverting your edit and will report you myself if I see it undone. There are plenty other topics to cover on that article you can spend your energies on.Galf (talk) 15:21, 22 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

WP:CANVASS edit

Please stop canvassing. I've requested administrator advice and recommended you be blocked. I will follow this up on ANI soon. --Merbabu (talk) 07:46, 22 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Indeed, this seems to be a violation of the "Campaigning" section of the guideline, as the wording of the mass-posted notice is anything but neutral. Orderinchaos 10:59, 22 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

SSP Case edit

  You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Domaleixo. Thank you. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 16:00, 22 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

March 2010 edit

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war at Dili. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

The complete report of this case is at WP:AN3#User:Domaleixo reported by User:J. Patrick Fischer (Result:1 week). EdJohnston (talk) 16:56, 22 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your block has been extended to one month per WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Domaleixo. You also seem to be warring over Díli on the Portuguese Wikipedia. In this edit, signed by you as 'Domaleixo', you call another user a MORON. You may be unblocked after one week if you express willingness to follow our policies and agree to (a) follow a 1RR rule, (b) cease the personal attacks, (c) limit yourself to a single account. EdJohnston (talk) 20:27, 23 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Languages of Cape Verde edit

 Template:Languages of Cape Verde has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Victão Lopes I hear you... 21:42, 22 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Najib.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Najib.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:50, 3 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:Adé.PNG edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Adé.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:56, 20 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Soundvisions1 (talk) 18:56, 20 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:S.Tomé.PNG edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:S.Tomé.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk 02:19, 28 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Files listed for deletion edit

Some of your images or media files have been listed for deletion. Please see Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 January 3 if you are interested in preserving them. Thank you. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 03:20, 3 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:Tião Carreiro & Pardinho.PNG edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Tião Carreiro & Pardinho.PNG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:15, 17 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Tuna Macaense for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tuna Macaense is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tuna Macaense until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. CharlieEchoTango 03:30, 5 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Samoa.PNG listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Samoa.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:56, 21 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Samoaflag.PNG listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Samoaflag.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:58, 21 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Kamerun.gif listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kamerun.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 18:08, 1 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Brasão de Vitória - ES.svg edit

 

A tag has been placed on File:Brasão de Vitória - ES.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 06:46, 3 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:São tomé.PNG edit

 

The file File:São tomé.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 29 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Moçambique português.gif edit

 

The file File:Moçambique português.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 2 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Dai Nihon Teikoku.png edit

 

The file File:Dai Nihon Teikoku.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Maps_of_the_Empire_of_Japan

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 03:53, 4 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Portuguese India.png edit

 

The file File:Portuguese India.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to File:Map of Portuguese India.png which is hosted on Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 03:56, 4 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Mlstp.PNG edit

 

The file File:Mlstp.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to File:Flag of MLSTP.svg which is hosted on Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 03:57, 4 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Pea-mozambique.PNG edit

 

The file File:Pea-mozambique.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned raster image that was not used to create the corresponding vector image and thus is not needed for attribution purposes; very questionable licensing as the uploader is claiming to be the author of an official coat of arms

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HouseBlastertalk 18:17, 7 March 2022 (UTC)Reply