October 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm XenonNSMB. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Least sandpiper—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. XenonNSMB (talk, contribs) 15:00, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Least sandpiper. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:06, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

What edits can I make? DlDNT (talk) 15:09, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Im also a furry lol DlDNT (talk) 15:11, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Species, you may be blocked from editing. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:08, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

I just welcomed everyone who views the page. I cant do that? DlDNT (talk) 15:10, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Least sandpiper. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:19, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 15:24, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Pls unblock me, I edited it for males and female birds DlDNT (talk) 15:28, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Competence is required to edit wikipedia. Your edits up to your most recent edit have been patent nonsense, vandalism, or unconstructive. Your most recent edit was reverted for not providing a reliable source. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 16:32, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

unblock

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DlDNT (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I wont make vandalism, I wanted to make a new seciton of males and females, no vandalism DlDNT (talk) 15:36, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 17:03, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.