Diplomacy125

Your submission at Articles for creation: Science Diplomacy in Biomedicine (May 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Numberguy6 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Science Diplomacy in Biomedicine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Science Diplomacy in Biomedicine, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Numberguy6 (talk) 02:49, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Diplomacy125! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Numberguy6 (talk) 02:49, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Essays on Wikipedia

I looked at your essay about cyber diplomacy and tried to advise you on IRC that it did indeed read like an essay and - as a result - was not acceptable as a Wikipedia article in its current form. While you claim to be using reliable sources, the general form of how you are using those sources is to produce original research, something we, as humble Wikipedia editors, must not do.

You mentioned that this essay was being produced for a class. If I were grading it, I'd be critical of the way it slides between what might be called ordinary cyber security issues and sloppily escalates them into having diplomatic consequences. I'd be surprised if you can find these issues treated consistently in the literature, since most of the people purporting to write about the subject know only small parts of the whole problem. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:07, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Science Diplomacy in Biomedicine

Hello, Diplomacy125. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Science Diplomacy in Biomedicine, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:17, 30 October 2022 (UTC)