Dijitol1977

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mick Park (DJ / Music Producer) (September 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mick Park (DJ / Music Producer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:49, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Dijitol1977! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:49, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Mick Park (DJ / Music Producer)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Mick Park (DJ / Music Producer), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ~Liance^talk 17:50, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

I have explained in another message why this article really should be ok for inclusion please let me know if you need more the gent is accomplished with his work and needs to be included Dijitol1977 (talk) 18:00, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Why was this deleted please ? I replied in time with reasons Dijitol1977 (talk) 18:12, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

@Dijitol1977 your new draft does not seem to be overly promotional, and I won't mark it for deletion - but it needs to have the correct references.

What professional or personal connection do you have with Mick Park? Qcne (talk) 19:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the feedback. I've updated the article to include in-line citations as per the referencing guidelines. Each claim is now supported by a relevant citation. If any further adjustments are needed, please let me know.

I have been a fan for TILT and mick park for over 20 years and noticed a lot of the others like oakenfold Sasha and his band Titl have a wiki but Mick Park doensnt. Thought it only fair as he is mentioned on those pages that he have a page hope that’s ok Dijitol1977 (talk) 19:51, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Apologies for all this typos this phone is annoying at best of times Dijitol1977 (talk) 19:52, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Dijitol1977, I have replied below to say you've unfortunately failed to cite properly. We cannot accept the draft in it's current state. I would really suggest using a laptop/desktop to edit. Qcne (talk) 19:53, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Or see User:Cullen328/Smartphone editing#How I edit by smartphone. This trick is to still use the desktop version even if editing on a mobile device. Scroll to the very bottom of the page and click the Desktop link. S0091 (talk) 19:56, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi thanks for the advice I will take a look a this tommorow I didn’t realise it would be so difficult, I will research what you have said and hopefully fix what’s wrong thanks again Dijitol1977 (talk) 21:14, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mick Park (September 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mick Park and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 19:06, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dijitol1977 (talk) 19:43, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the feedback. I've updated the article to include in-line citations as per the referencing guidelines. Each claim is now supported by a relevant citation. If any further adjustments are needed, please let me know.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mick Park (September 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mick Park and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 19:44, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

@Dijitol1977 I am afraid you haven't formatted the references properly at all, and it seems you didn't follow the tutorial I've linked earlier. All your sources are now external links. Check other biographic articles on Wikipedia and you'll see how different yours looks. It is mandatory for in-line citations to be present for biographies.

The sources also must be reliable: a number of your sources are not. Qcne (talk) 19:52, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Mick Park has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mick Park. Thanks! S0091 (talk) 19:46, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Dijitol1977. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. S0091 (talk) 19:53, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi I don’t have a conflict of interest I’m just a fan, over the years I have met the guys (TILT) to get autograph's at gigs twice but I don’t know them Dijitol1977 (talk) 21:17, 11 September 2024 (UTC)