Digitalcomplex

Your submission at Articles for creation: Razed To The Ground (September 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kethrus was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Digitalcomplex/Razed To The Ground and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

--I am Kethrus ^{Talk to me!} 23:25, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello! Digitalcomplex, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! --I am Kethrus Talk to me! 23:25, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

I left a more in-depth explanation on the sources used. I hope it helps.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Razed To The Ground has been accepted

Razed To The Ground, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

--I am Kethrus ^{Talk to me!} 00:21, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Your username

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Digitalcomplex", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Trammel Museum of Art". However, you are invited to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you personally, such as "Mark at WidgetsUSA", "Jack Smith at the XY Foundation", and "WidgetFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, or website, regardless of your username. Moreover, I recommend that you read our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please create a new account or request a change of username, by completing this form, that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Your username gives off the impression that you're editing for Digital Complex Records. Your edits haven't been promotional and you seem to genuinely want to learn policy, so I see no reason to block you. Just be careful to make sure that you change your username soon. Let me know if you have any questions about anything. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:42, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

I am very sorry, but this is actually offensive. I've had the name Digital Complex- in all different variations of spacing and format- for over 10 years now. I have proof and evidence of this and I have never even heard of Digital Complex Records until just now. It is a name I came up with a long time ago and I have used it in every account imaginable since then. This record label looks like it is more recent, and I am a bit upset that the name is very close in use to the way that I have used it. Never mind the fact that their genre of music is not even remotely close to anything I've touched on. Which would have been greatly appreciated to be noticed. But no... I've had this name for a long time. In fact, I used it on Wikipedia before there was any hint of that label, according to the Google search I just did. I'm not going to let someone push me into changing a name I've used exclusively for so long just because someone else started using it after I did. I have not promoted anyone, especially them, and I have clearly stated before this was brought to my attention that I appreciate any suggestions to help anything I write come across as objective and avoid the possibility of sounding promotional. And, again, this is news to me, I've never heard of them until now, I do honestly feel like the name may have been taken from some things I've done in the past, and I am not going to change my name based on this. Name any evidence you want that the name I'm using has been used by me for a long time and I'll provide it. Because I am offended, extremely angry, and I think there should be more due diligence to look at the history of the use of this name, the type of music that label apparently promotes, and the type of music I've touched on. Because the two types of music are not even the tiniest bit related. And also, like I said, there is the fact that I used this name here on Wikipedia many years ago.

I'm not happy right now. I had the name first. I will dispute this as long as I have to. Digitalcomplex (talk) 16:01, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

I looked. This account was created on January 9th, 2008. And I'm the only person that has ever used it. It is so frustrating that there are so many hurdles to jump through when simply trying to contribute. Accusations, or even hints at accusations, should be weighed more heavily and more deeply considered before being thrown around so recklessly. What is the point in trying to contribute to a collective such as this, out of nothing but interest and the desire to help spread knowledge, when scrutiny is so prevalent? Digitalcomplex (talk) 16:48, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

YGM

Hello, Digitalcomplex. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.--  Kethrus |talk to me  11:22, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Big thanks for discovering and fixing a vandalism from June 2016 (!) in Covington, Kentucky. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 21:10, 5 April 2017 (UTC)