Dhivyaadhanu

AfC notification: Draft:Regina (2022 film) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Regina (2022 film). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:42, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Regina (2022 film) (May 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Regina (2022 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Regina (2022 film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:44, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Dhivyaadhanu! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:44, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Regina (2022 Upcoming Indian Film) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Regina (2022 Upcoming Indian Film), should not have been created directly without impartial review. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Cabayi (talk) 17:28, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

June 2022

Hello, Dhivyaadhanu, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Sathish Nair. M (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Cabayi (talk) 17:30, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Regina (2022 film) (June 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Slywriter was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Regina (2022 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Regina (2022 film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Slywriter (talk) 09:02, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Regina (2022 film) (November 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Regina (2022 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

331dot (talk) 10:49, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

November 2022

Hello Dhivyaadhanu. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Dhivyaadhanu. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Dhivyaadhanu|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 10:50, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Hi @331dot, I am not sure about the paid disclosure policy. Could you please clearly explain me about this. Kindly help me to publish the article and I am sure about the references which I have submitted. Kindly do the needful 122.178.12.56 (talk) 10:32, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Do you have an association with the production of this film? 331dot (talk) 15:21, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the response @331dot! I am not directly associated with the film. One of my connections is working for the film. So I am helping them to publish the movie here with the available sources. Could you please help me to publish the the movie? I am not sure about the paid disclosure policy and I couldn't get how to resolve this. Kindly do the needful. Thanks in advance! Dhivyaadhanu (talk) 06:59, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

If you work for the film, you are a paid editor. Paid editing is not limited to specific payment for edits, and includes any paid relationship like employment. Please make the paid editing disclosure on your user page. If you find the coding too challenging, you may simply write out something to the effect of "I work for (whomever the film producer is), the maker of the film I am writing about". This is a Terms of Use requirement and mandatory. As noted at the AFC Help Desk, Wikipedia has no interest in helping you promote your film- once the film is released and there are some reviews about it to summarize in the article, it can be resubmitted. You should not place it in the encyclopedia itself due to your conflict of interest. 331dot (talk) 09:55, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Thank you so much for a clear response @331dot! Ok then, I will add the paid editing disclosure in my user page then will resubmit the article after the movie release with few summarized reviews. I hope it will work. Thanks again! Dhivyaadhanu (talk) 04:56, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Regina (2022 film)

Hello, Dhivyaadhanu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Regina".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 12:08, 14 May 2023 (UTC)