Deci922, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Deci922! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GoingBatty (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2017 Oklahoma vs Kansas football game

edit
 

The article 2017 Oklahoma vs Kansas football game has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't seem like a notable match, no evidence found that this match is known as "the trashtalk bowl", just some contemporary reports like this but nothing which sets this game apart from thousands of others and shows lasting notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 09:04, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of 2017 Oklahoma vs Ohio State football game

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 2017 Oklahoma vs Ohio State football game requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.) that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fram (talk) 09:05, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

this is a major upset this is not deserving of a delete it Deci922 (talk) 17:58, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

June 2022

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at United States Minor Outlying Islands. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 23:57, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Southeastern High School (Chillicothe, Ohio), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. PHANTOMTECH (talk) 21:06, 17 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

nobody likes southeastern why do you care

Nomination of 2017 Oklahoma vs Kansas football game for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2017 Oklahoma vs Kansas football game is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 Oklahoma vs Kansas football game until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 07:30, 15 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

i worked very hard on making that and you nominate it for deletion? plus its a notable game Deci922 (talk) 14:18, 15 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Working hard on something isn't a valid reason for keeping an article. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and as such has inclusion requirements, especially Notability. It's up to you to make an effort to understand what those requirements are before you create something that doesn't meet the requirements. We have all had our work deleted, including whole articles. It's part of the learning process. One way to avoid having your work deleted is to make an effort to find out if others think it's notable. For this game, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football would have been a good place to ask. BilCat (talk) 22:01, 15 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

I fixed the article to make it better. I know someone who thinks this is a notable match. Deci922 (talk) 01:31, 16 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:14, 17 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Deci922 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Your reason here how the hell am i here to "not build an encyclopedia" i fucking made a page of an important football game and the southeastern thing was a joke (but its accurate)

Decline reason:

WP:GAB explains how to craft an unblock request with a chance of success. Yamla (talk) 20:07, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.