DeathMaster2001
Welcome!
|
Copyright violation edit
Hi DeathMaster2001. I have removed the plot section you added to Reef Blower, as it appears to have been copied from http://belfid.blogspot.ca/2011/03/spongebob-squarepants.html, which pre-dates its first appearance on this wiki. You are welcome to write a plot description using your own words. -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:33, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 31 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bubblestand, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tim Hill. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Standalone notability edit
Hi there, though you mean well with your recent edits fleshing out articles Reef Blower and Bubblestand, we don't typically create articles on individual television episodes unless those television episodes have achieved standalone notability. Some examples of what might make an individual episode notable, might be if it was about a controversial subject that subsequently drew a great deal of critical discussion, or if the episode was well established as having inspired certain notable people or works, and so on. Simply existing isn't a sufficient reason for an episode article to exist. Additionally, the WikiProject Television community doesn't find IMDb user ratings to be worth inclusion in any article. We are only interested in what critics from reliable sources have to say about any given work. I have converted these articles back to redirects. Thanks and it's nothing personal. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:26, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
One Coarse Meal is Not Noticeable Enough to Warrant an Article edit
I understand that you think that One Coarse Meal warrants an wikipedia article due to the criticism by critics on Youtube. However, outside of these reviewers, this episode is not extremely noticeable. Therefore, the article that you have created violated the notability rule of wikipedia: that an episode must have standalone notability in order to have a wikipedia article. Take a look at some of the other standalone episode articles such as Help Wanted, Band Geeks, and Atlantis SquarePantis. Help Wanted is noticeable because it was the debut episode of Spongebob Squarepants, Band Geeks is noticeable because many fans and critics hailed it to be one of the best episodes of all time. Atlantis SquarePantis is noticable because it is a TV Special that contained both critical insight of the episode by critics and outside marketing. I know you like Mr. Enter's reviews since he reviewed this very episode on Animated Atrocities #13, but Mr. Enter is an amateur critic on Youtube and not a professional critic. In other words, Mr. Enter is not a reliable source yet. Yoshiman6464 (talk) 06:58, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit
Hello, DeathMaster2001. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit
Hello, DeathMaster2001. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit
Hello, DeathMaster2001. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit
Hello, DeathMaster2001. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Re: Caidin Johnson edit
Hi Andrew, thanks, I've blocked that account, but next time it'd be better to note it at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism, perhaps with a link to the long-term abuse page. Graham87 05:29, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
- Also, have you heard of Wikipedia's original Andrew Norman? :-) I don't actually know him; I just know his username because I update the former admins pages on here and he was desysopped due to inactivity. His last edit was before your first one with this account. Graham87 16:15, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
- Alright, thanks for letting me know. By the way, this is my first time reporting a sock-puppet account, so I didn't really know about the "administrator intervention against vandalism" page up until this point. But anyways, thank you!
- P.S. I don't know about this other Andrew Norman. It is pretty interesting that we both have the same name :) DeathMaster2001 (talk) 21:50, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
- No worries. Just to clarify though: the administrator intervention against vandalism page is only for extremely obvious vandalism, like the Caidin Johnson case. Pages like the admins' incident noticeboard and sockpuppet investigations are useful for less obvious cases. The tool Twinkle can be helpful for these sorts of reports. I thought you'd like the Andrew Norman coincidence. Graham87 12:49, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
- You're welcome. I've been doing a lot of research about Caidin and what he's been doing over these past few years. I'm pretty sure you already know that he also vandalizes FANDOM (or Wikia) and he creates sock-puppets over there too. I even created a list of the sock-puppets I managed to find that have been blocked globally by FANDOM's admins (I found about 82 accounts). I also found out that he has multiple sock-puppet YouTube accounts. I found out that he had made 40 alternate YouTube accounts (21 of them are all called "Paramount Logos (number) - (insert topic here)". DeathMaster2001 (talk) 20:57, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
- No worries. Just to clarify though: the administrator intervention against vandalism page is only for extremely obvious vandalism, like the Caidin Johnson case. Pages like the admins' incident noticeboard and sockpuppet investigations are useful for less obvious cases. The tool Twinkle can be helpful for these sorts of reports. I thought you'd like the Andrew Norman coincidence. Graham87 12:49, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit
| | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |