User talk:Deadlyops/Archive 1

Welcome

Hello, Deadlyops! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! PrincessofLlyr (talk) 00:32, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Talkback

 
Hello, Deadlyops. You have new messages at PrincessofLlyr's talk page.
Message added 00:44, 10 January 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

PrincessofLlyr (talk) 00:44, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Joseph Greer

 

A tag has been placed on Joseph Greer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Eeekster (talk) 00:48, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Adoption offer

Hi Deadlyops! If you want, I would be happy to adopt you and show you the ropes. You can find out more about me on my user page and through my userboxes. Please reply to this message at my talk page or on my adoption sub-page. strdst_grl (call me Stardust) 15:09, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Okay, I've made it official. Whenever you have any problems, questions, or just want to talk, please leave a note on my adoption page and I will get back to you as soon as I can! strdst_grl (call me Stardust) 21:32, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Just to let you know that I have replied to your message on my adoption page. In future, I will not alert you of this, but I will generally reply promptly. If you want to know when I reply, add the page to your watchlist. strdst_grl (call me Stardust) 21:50, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

List of ornithologists abbreviated names

You placed a request for speedy deletion tag on List of ornithologists abbreviated names. It was and is a work in progress and it now has some substantive information. Also, in the future, when adding RSD tags it is nice to inform the creator so he can react before it gets deleted. Take a look now and see what is evolving. It is going to be a lengthy work in progress, as I have 4 books to rifle through. speednat (talk) 06:08, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Adoption update

Hey! I just wanted to check that you were still getting on okay. From your recent edits, things look fine, but I'm still here if there's anything you need help with. strdst_grl (call me Stardust) 07:33, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Star Wars: The Force Unleashed II on the PC

The reliable source is here. And on Wookieepedia they tell that the PC version will be developed by Aspyr. 84.86.199.99 (talk) 15:05, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

My Apologies

it appears my edit is considered vandalism, are you refering to the picture removal or the uziga blanking, if either or just one, i am sorry for it, it wont happen again i assure you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paistor (talkcontribs) 23:15, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Reviewer permission

 

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:10, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Rnc 64

Hello Deadlyops. Thanks for the speedy deletion work you are doing; it's a very important activity! I did want to let you know, though, regarding Rnc 64, that current consensus holds that it is bad practice to tag articles for speedy deletion as lacking context (CSD A1) or content (CSD A3) moments after creation, as users may be actively working on the article content. Ten to fifteen minutes is considered a good time to wait before tagging such articles under either of these criteria. Please note that before an appropriate waiting period is over, the articles should not be marked as patrolled, so that the wait does not result in the article escaping review at a later time. Nothing here is meant to apply to any other criterion; attack pages and copyright violations especially should be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks. Salvio ( Let's talk 'bout it!) 15:50, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Acc account creation Application

I have applied for the Account creation tool.this is a Confimation editDeadlyOps (talk) 17:29, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Piltzintecuhtli

An article that you have been involved in editing, Piltzintecuhtli, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piltzintecuhtli. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Whenaxis (talk) 11:03, 19 July 2010 (UTC)