October 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm Moxy. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Moxy (talk) 01:18, 12 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

December 2018

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did at Hillary Clinton, you may be blocked from editing. - MrX 🖋 22:21, 11 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  TonyBallioni (talk) 23:12, 11 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Darensillo21 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

With all respect towards the admin, I want to request my unblock. My recent act of vandalism and destruction of several pages were very childish acts from my part and I fully take responsability on the acts I commited and I fully regret. From now and on I will do my best to improve this amazing community and I promise to follow the Wikipedia rules, because this site has given me so much, and from now on I just want to give back what they have given me. Thanks for your time and hopefully y'all accept my petition.

Decline reason:

Nah, doesn't seem likely to me. There's literally a years-long history of vandalism on this account, and no substantive contributions. If you're serious, you may consider whether you would like to go through the procedure listed here: Template:2nd chance. Let me know. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 00:48, 12 December 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.--Darensillo21 (talk) 00:21, 12 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Darensillo21 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Dear admin (Kevin), I am very serious about it. I have rewied the 2nd chance block thing, and I really want to help this community, I have only commited 2 acts of vandalism, one in Venezuela and one in Hillary Clinton, and it happened during September 2018 to November 2018, not during years as they claim, my account is barely 1 year old. So I request my unblock, Please

Decline reason:

I took a look through your contributions. You committed numerous acts of vandalism, far more than the two you claim, and substantially earlier than September 2018. Given your active attempt to mislead us and your complete unwillingness to attempt the {{2nd chance}}, it's clear Wikipedia would be harmed by unblocking you. You may attempt to be unblocked again, no sooner than six months from now, and only if you abide by WP:SO (and specifically, zero edits from now until then). At that point, follow the {{2nd chance}} instructions. Yamla (talk) 01:34, 12 December 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Darensillo21 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

As I mentioned before, I have commited only 2 acts of vandaslism towards this community, in my contributions log, you can see that the only 2 acts of vandalism where October 11th 2017 for the article of Venezuela, they appear as 20+ but all between the same hour, that counts as one act of vandalism, second was today, which I really regret, that they appear as 10+ but all between the same time intervals. So I will plese ask you to please check more before giving a wrong answer to me. I have contributed in sites like "List of countries by Nominal GDP, which is a topic I really like that is economics", I will gladly help on any thing you require, any article, if you unblock me you can block me again if I dont make what y'all say. I hope y'all understand and please unblock me Darensillo21 (talk) 04:31, 12 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

It's only one act of vandalism because you did them quickly? That's an interesting theory. If you take the standard offer, as advised above, you might have an opportunity to discuss it with the community some time in the future. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 05:34, 12 December 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Block evasion

edit

User has engaged in block evasion as of December, 2018. --Yamla (talk) 20:09, 12 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Do not blank this information about your current block. --Yamla (talk) 11:30, 13 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Darensillo21 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #23579 was submitted on Dec 14, 2018 02:18:37. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 02:18, 14 December 2018 (UTC)Reply