DanieleProcida

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, DanieleProcida, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Telsa (talk) 09:57, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Sean Donnelly (rapper)

If the article goes, I can let you have a copy in your userspace if required. I'm not deleting it 'cos I'm intrigued by the idea of a binman rapper getting into The Guardian... It's a bit single event (WP:BLP1E though. You need to get something more there. Peridon (talk) 16:58, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Cardiff music scene

I have just make a few changes to this article: wikilinks and categories. Was that your first article? Nice start! Telsa (talk) 09:57, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Per request

See link on your new userpage. Remember this is done for the purpose of improving, and aiming to show more notability, and it can't stay there for ever. When you think it's OK, ask for advice (not just from me - try people like User:Boing! said Zebedee, User:Fæ or User:MelanieN before moving it into mainspace (or other regular editors - I listed them because they're particularly user-friendly). Best to get it right first. Good luck. Peridon (talk) 19:31, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Divio

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Divio requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MrOllie (talk) 15:22, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

February 2021

Hello DanieleProcida. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:DanieleProcida. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=DanieleProcida|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. MrOllie (talk) 15:24, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you MrOllie. I am employed by Divio, but I am not being paid to write this content. However to avoid confusion I will add a disclosure to my profile. DanieleProcida (talk) 15:28, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

MrOllie Actually I just tried to do that, but it states that I am employed by Divio (which is true) but also that I am specifically paid by Divio to edit content in Wikipedia (which is not). I am happy to disclose the affiliation if there is a way to do that though. DanieleProcida (talk) 15:33, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for adding the notification. Wikipedia does draw not as fine a distinction as you seem to be - you are paid by Divio, so you are a paid editor. You should replace the notice, and be sure to read the conflict of interest guidelines linked above thoroughly, particularly the bits about creating new articles through the WP:AFC process and using talk page requests instead of making edits about your employer or their products directly. - MrOllie (talk) 15:33, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

OK, done. Sorry, it is many years since I (very occasionally) edited anything. I wasn't aware of all that. Is there some way to move the article into the process you describe, or do I have to start it all from scratch? DanieleProcida (talk) 15:49, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

DanieleProcida, If you contact the admin that carried out the deletion on their talk page, they will most likely move it into draft space for you. MrOllie (talk) 15:50, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Graziella (bicycle) (May 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Graziella (bicycle) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Graziella (bicycle), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 22:29, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello, DanieleProcida! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 22:29, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Graziella (bicycle)

Hello, DanieleProcida. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Graziella (bicycle), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:03, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Graziella (bicycle) has been accepted

Graziella (bicycle), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 09:33, 22 May 2022 (UTC)