Damatucci

Hello, I'm Dorothy! (Damatucci (talk) 16:33, 25 September 2012 (UTC)damatucci)

Hello!

I'm very excited to see what you'll be developing. Yobi831 (talk) 16:39, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Damatucci, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us!

I, and the rest of the hosts, would be more than happy to answer any questions you have! SarahStierch (talk) 04:22, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

WikiWomen's Collaborative

WikiWomen Unite!

Hi Damatucci! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative. As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by: Liking the WikiWomen's Collaborative on Facebook and share your tips, projects, and connect with other WikiWomen Join the conversation on our Twitter feed Reading and writing for our blog channel We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can participate! Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 04:22, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Page Review and Suggestions

Hi Dorothy, nice job so far!

You've added new parts and content to enrich the page and they fit in well, concise but comprehensive.

I can tell the original page is bit underdeveloped which requires lots of work. I guess you've figured out how to put it into a good shape and I'm looking forward to your final work. Here I just want to offer you several suggestions, see if they can offer additional help.

Since we've covered Organizational Information Theory in class, I recalled that there were background information concerning origin theories which have impact on OIT. You may have a background section.

Also we get familiar with assumptions of each theory before we dive into it. So you can have a assumption section or simply summarize them in the leading paragraph.

The main body looks fine to me. But examples to show applications of the theory are always welcomed. I'm sure you've found resources in your previous research. Last but not least, I think a longer reference list will make your page more credible. Don't forget to put internal links, which is easier to do and equally informative and valuable.

I know the coming weeks will become pretty busy for everyone, whereas we still need to make efforts to develop an inviting page. Let's stay energetic and get it done!

Stellalqx (talk) 02:53, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi Dorothy! It looks like you've done a lot of work to build your page, which is fantastic! I think one way that you can improve your page would be to add more references - having a few more references will allow you to added more sections (which is something that Wikipedia looks for to consider an article "A- class"). Also, you might want to consider adding more to the "Utility of the Theory" section (however, I know these pages are works in progress). You have clearly made some significant edits to the page! Another thing to consider is that Wikipedia likes articles to have strong lead section; therefore, you might want to add more to the lead of the page. Furthermore, you might want to add some subsections to the page - since Wikipedia also views that as important to consider the page an "A-class" article. Overall, your page looks really good! Reinamg (talk) 04:51, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Amatucci Profile Pic.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Amatucci Profile Pic.jpg, which you've sourced to Erin Dawson Photography. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:13, 23 January 2013 (UTC)