DaliborKiselja

July 2019

Hello, I'm Jack90s15. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Jack90s15 (talk) 05:43, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

You're welcome. DaliborKiselja (talk) 05:47, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cockatiel. William Avery (talk) 08:42, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

You're welcome. DaliborKiselja (talk) 08:45, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ST47 (talk) 09:52, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DaliborKiselja (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was accused on doing vandalism. There is no concrete proof that I put pornographic picture on wikipedia. Therefore I demand to be unblocked. DaliborKiselja (talk) 10:21, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Talk page access revoked. ST47 (talk) 10:22, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.