http://www.dry-magazine.com/?p=5924

A page you started (Sonali Raut) has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating Sonali Raut, Dakinibsm!

Wikipedia editor Abhishek191288 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for the new page. Cheers!

To reply, leave a comment on Abhishek191288's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

May 2014 edit

It's not my intention to make wrong edits, i thought lead section was too long as it described telugu film industry, economic features, some historical matter which is already described in history section namely quli qutub shah's rule. So, i performed that edit. I'm here to help wiki, so it will not be repeated again.Vin09 (talk) 13:48, 7 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Telugu Cinema edit

Hello. I'm Phani M. Recently you have posted me a message mentioning that I'm vandalizing due to lack of experience. How did you confirm that the edits were done by me? For your information, my contributions are 5 in number to Telugu cinema. Those also didn't contain any words which were mentioned by you. To confirm go to history.

My contributions were

Know properly who is editing. Value the good contributor. And even one vandalizes, this is not the way of posting message/warning. You are a valuable contributor. You may correct/fix errors, but not by mentioning fixing errors of some XXXX.

Thank you. -Phani M talk 13:01, 11 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Note edit

Use edit summary carefully. It is you who was making disruptive edit by adding a copyvio video that has already been deleted too. TitoDutta 16:24, 20 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Talkback message from Tito Dutta edit

 
Hello, Dakinibsm. You have new messages at Titodutta's talk page.
Message added 18:10, 20 May 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

TitoDutta 18:10, 20 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:Oh friend this waiting.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Oh friend this waiting.jpg, which you've attributed to movie poster session. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:16, 22 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Sonali Raut for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sonali Raut is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonali Raut until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 20:34, 25 September 2014 (UTC)Reply