March 2013 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Talkback edit

 
Hello, Custardpieboy. You have new messages at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk.
Message added 22:25, 11 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question on Tim Gosling edit

  Hello, Custardpieboy! I'm Huon. I have replied to your question on the Articles for Creation Help Desk about Tim Gosling.
You can read it at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk#Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tim Gosling. Huon (talk) 13:57, 30 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tim Gosling (March 10) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tim Gosling (March 18) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tim Gosling (March 19) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 
Hello! Custardpieboy, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Talkback edit

 
Hello, Custardpieboy. You have new messages at 78.26's talk page.
Message added 17:15, 19 March 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 17:15, 19 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tim Gosling (March 20) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

A cookie for you! edit

  Hi there. I noticed your persistence in getting Tim Gosling into the mainspace and I wanted to thank you for all of your contributions. Another editor has taken it upon themselves to improve it and move it to the mainspace shortly after you last edited it. It is now readable at Tim Gosling! Feel free to improve and work on it there. Here's a wiki-cookie. Again, thank you for your dedication. Mz7 (talk) 03:25, 21 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
 
Tim Gosling, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Mz7 (talk) 03:27, 21 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

A belated welcome! edit

 
Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!  

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Custardpieboy. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Mz7 (talk) 03:26, 21 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Custardpieboy/sandbox (March 30) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

Tim Gosling edit

Hi again. I noticed you wanted to include some pictures at the article Tim Gosling. To include pictures, you have to upload them to Wikipedia; however, I wanted let you know Wikipedia has a rather stringent image use policy that says what kinds of pictures are acceptable for use in the encyclopedia. In a nutshell, you should be very careful in checking the copyright status of the image you want to upload. Most of the time, images uploaded to Wikipedia should be either images you created yourself, or images made available under an acceptable free license. Under special circumstances, it is okay to upload copyrighted images under a fair use claim. If you feel that the images you want to include in the article satisfy the image use policy, head over to the Wikipedia:File Upload Wizard, which will guide you through the process of uploading images. If you have any questions, feel free to leave a message at my talk page or head over to the Teahouse. Best, Mz7 (talk) 18:07, 30 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Reference Errors on 30 March edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 01:08, 31 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use File:Straw Marquetry Bar Cabinet.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Straw Marquetry Bar Cabinet.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. 07:45, 9 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

April 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tim Gosling may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Wilkins]] and [[Rosalind Franklin]] at [[King's College London]] in deducing the structure of [[DNA]</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:32, 11 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use File:Tim Gosling Portrait.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Tim Gosling Portrait.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 11:00, 25 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

There is no system that will allow a "For Wikipedia use only" image. The choice is a "free image" or a "non-free image". If the person is alive then you can forget non-free - it will always get marked as replaceable (because it is!). Wikipedia is not here to promote "two publicity pictures" in the way you want. If it is so important that the images are used here, then you will have to supply a proper copyright release - using the procedure at WP:DCM. One image is 432 × 576 pixels, you could upload half that size (with the copyright holder's permission sent in), which would be OK for an infobox in an article, but would reduce some of the potential for others to re-use it (make sure that the letter sent in stipulates the image size if you want to ensure that aspect).  Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:20, 25 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use File:Tim Gosling.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Tim Gosling.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 10:56, 7 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use File:Portrait of Tim Gosliing.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Portrait of Tim Gosliing.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 10:56, 7 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

image uploads edit

The issue with the images you have uploaded is that they are copyrighted. Wikipedia does not host copyrighted images of living people, as a freely licensed image could be taken. Has the copyright holder emailed Permissions@wikipedia releasing the image under a free license like this ? - Peripitus (Talk) 23:23, 9 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use File:Portrait of Tim Gosling.jpg edit

Dear Peripitus, I myself sent the permissions through to Permissions@wikipedia and these should have been checked by now so my images can be released? This has been going on for weeks now! Please can someone help me! Thanks so much in advance as am at my whits end! I also have two other images that have permission but I have yet to dare put on as its so complicated but I want to use - isn't there an easier way of doing this but I do see that you need permission which I have supplied?? Could you check that the images permission have been received and restore these images to the page please? Custardpieboy (talk) 12:27, 13 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

(talk page stalker) I'm an OTRS volunteer and admin, and I've just searched for your permission and I have found no email. The queue is rather clear and has been for some time. If you have permission from the original copyright holder, you can forward their permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org or they can email directly (see WP:CONSENT for details). If the copyright holder has not given evidence that they wish to release the file under a free license, we cannot host the file as it is a violation of our non-free policy (WP:NFCC)). Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 20:53, 13 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Just a note that when the OTRS permission email is actioned, deleted images can be easily undeleted so won't need re-uploading - Peripitus (Talk) 09:50, 14 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Tim Gosling - Furniture and Interior Designer.jpg edit

 

A tag has been placed on File:Tim Gosling - Furniture and Interior Designer.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:45, 22 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Duplicate image edit

The picure deleted was a duplicate. Approved one was File:Tim Gosling - Furniture Designer.jpg, which is being used. Secondarywaltz (talk) 18:42, 23 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Images of Tim Gosling edit

Hi. You asked if File:Tim Gosling - Furniture and Interior Designer.jpg could be restored but that is a duplicate of File:Tim Gosling - Furniture Designer.jpg. Perhaps File:Tim Gosling.jpg is what you were looking for? --MGA73 (talk) 06:43, 26 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, User:Custardpieboy/sandbox edit

 

Hello Custardpieboy. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "sandbox".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|User:Custardpieboy/sandbox}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 23:43, 6 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply