Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Cumberland Mills, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains(talk) 02:21, 10 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

How to add hidden editor notes in an article

Have you ever needed to post an important message to all editors about an article, on the article itself, but thought it would stick out like a sore thumb and ruin the article if you did? Are you reverting many edits on an article because editors just aren't seeing the important message or special instructions on the talk page?

The solution is that you can insert hidden text in the article! That way, only the people editing the page will see your message! Here is how to insert a hidden comment:

  1. First, begin the comment by typing <!--
  2. Once you have done that, type what you need the editors to read
  3. Then, end the comment by typing -->

Once you have completed those 3 easy steps, you won't be reverting as many mistakes!

For example, the following hidden comment has been used in the Meaning of life article, in the Popular views section:

<!--Please do not add 42 in this section. It is covered under the section titled "Popular culture treatments". Thank you.-->

Some more examples of pages that have hidden messages include:

Read more:
To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd}}

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started edit

Hello, Cumberland Mills. Thank you for your work on 2000 All-Pacific-10 Conference football team. User:Lightburst, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Lightburst}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Lightburst (talk) 01:50, 16 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for January 4 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2001 College Football All-America Team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fred Weary. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 4 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

All-Western vs All-Western Conference edit

You proposed deletion of the 1916 All-Western football team on grounds that it is "redundant" to 1916 All-Western Conference football team. To the contrary, the latter series of list articles are intended to cover all-conference teams for the "Western Conference". The former cover all teams in the region of the country (as it was known at the time) and included other significant Midwestern teams such as Notre Dame, Michigan State, and for more than a decade Michigan and Ohio State. (There is a similar dichotomy on the West Coast with "All-Pacific" and "All-Pacific Coast Conference" teams.) I think there's a reasonable discussion to be had as to the "merger" of these overlapping subsets, but AfD strikes me as the wrong forum for the discussion. Let me know if you would like to discuss. Cbl62 (talk) 14:35, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

1918 All-Eastern football team moved to draftspace edit

Thanks for your contributions to 1918 All-Eastern football team. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:45, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for January 23 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1930 All-Pro Team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Gibson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:48, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

All-Americans edit

Hi there. I saw your edit to Wes Chandler, changing the first-team selection in 1976 to third-team. I don't disagree, but it seems that some football pages might have been considering any selector, not just the official AA selectors. Compare 2023 College Football All-America Team to 2023 NCAA Men's Basketball All-Americans, the football AA pages have tended to be a laundry list of selectors. Anyways, just an FYI, in the event anyone happens to object later. Regards. —Bagumba (talk) 05:39, 24 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Lower case for BCS edit

Hello Cumberland Mills. First off, thank you for all that you've been doing. Just wanted to drop by regarding the national champions. This was brought up to me in the past, it's whenever we add 'BCS national champion', the n and c should be lower case. Like this infobox template shows: WP:NFLINFOBOX. @Hey man im josh edited many of these months ago. I'm bringing it up now because it looks like you may just be starting with the BCS. I'll take care of whatever is out there now. Any problems please let me know. Thanks in advance. - Bringingthewood (talk) 07:29, 25 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. I'll make sure to do that going forward. I appreciate your effort to make them consistent! Cumberland Mills (talk) 18:01, 25 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
You're very welcome. No problem at all doing a little editing on my side. Besides, you must be seeing All-American in your sleep, lol. Again, thank you for all that you do! Regards. - Bringingthewood (talk) 21:07, 25 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to join WikiProject National Football League edit

  Hi, Cumberland Mills. You are cordially invited to join WikiProject National Football League, a project dedicated to improving articles in relation to the National Football League.
Please visit the project's talk page to see what areas/topics need help and to discuss any questions you may have. Thank you! Hey man im josh (talk) 12:18, 25 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thomas Trenchard edit

I'm not sure the edit of Consensus All-American makes any sense because there was only one All-America team, i.e. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1893_College_Football_All-America_Team. If I read the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_Football_All-America_Team page correctly, there weren't multiple lists until the 1920's. Jamesleegilbert (talk) 04:49, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for pointing this out. I see the argument that there was a single All-America team at the time, and I think that the "Consensus" label is worth reconsidering for that time period. In my own opinion though, I would still lean toward describing the player as a Consensus selection. At the time, there were 2 "official" selectors (Walter Camp and Caspar Whitney). If a player was selected by both official selectors, I think it is fair to describe them as a Consensus pick. Thanks! Cumberland Mills (talk) 18:26, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply