Your submission at Articles for creation: European Scientific Cooperative on Phytotherapy (June 3) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 18:27, 3 June 2016 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Csupord, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:27, 3 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: European Scientific Cooperative on Phytotherapy (June 20) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 16:16, 20 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:European Scientific Cooperative on Phytotherapy has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:European Scientific Cooperative on Phytotherapy. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:49, 15 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: European Scientific Cooperative on Phytotherapy (September 23) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 04:32, 23 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: European Scientific Cooperative on Phytotherapy (October 29) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 18:18, 29 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising. SwisterTwister talk 03:27, 31 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hypericum perforatum reference edit

You are referring to this link, which is not a source that any Wikipedia user can read, but rather must purchase. It is not a WP:SECONDARY reference. --Zefr (talk) 15:04, 13 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about European Scientific Cooperative on Phytotherapy edit

Hello, Csupord,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username CatcherStorm and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, European Scientific Cooperative on Phytotherapy should be deleted. Your comments are welcome over Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/European Scientific Cooperative on Phytotherapy .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|CatcherStorm}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

CatcherStorm talk 19:02, 1 February 2019 (UTC)Reply