Creative factor

Welcome!

Hi, Creative factor. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Ruby Murray 12:46, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to JS Group‎, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Ruby Murray 12:46, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. I have discussed valid points at Talk Page. Please do not incorporate them again as this is misleading and false. All references are put in talk page.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at JS Group, you may be blocked from editing. Fraggle81 (talk) 13:36, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at JS Group, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Flat Out let's discuss it 05:17, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Conflict of Interest

Hello, Creative factor. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article JS Group, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

• Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
• Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
• Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
• Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Flat Out let's discuss it 05:17, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at JS Group. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. SMS ^Talk 09:51, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

JS Group

The reason Creative factor (talk) The page of JS Group is full of personal attacks. land Grabbing Case was against owner, not its group. so it must not be shared at JS Group page. Allegations of Sunday leader was fake as no reports of SECP are found or lodged. Finally, Sprint Energy is not owned by JS Group, it has shares in it. Bonus to Ali siddiqui is nothing to do with company operations. So kindly tell me how these information can be removed from page.

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 09:59, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Creative factor, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Creative factor! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:42, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

ANI discusison

Hello, Creative factor. As I noted above, you are still copy-pasting content into articles. This is a serious issue, but I'm more concerned that you and User:Corporate cat seem to be working together to advance an agenda for JS Group that contravenes our conflict of interest guidelines. Accordingly, I've opened a section at the administrators noticeboard to discuss my concerns and the best way forward. You can find and participate in the discussion here. While your account is currently blocked, you should be able to leave any notes here on your talk page that could be carried over to that discussion. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 15:14, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Creative factor (talk) 07:52, 18 February 2014 (UTC) to Moonriddengirl I got the point. I wont contradict with policies in future. please enable my account. I wont use more than one account. Thank you.

With another account (User:Cat after cat) editing to make exactly the same kind of changes that you were making, it's impossible to accept what you're saying on face value. Since the note above your account has been indefinitely blocked, this kind of coordinated work to advance an agenda on Wikipedia is completely incompatible with our aims. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 11:18, 18 February 2014 (UTC)