Hello, Creamy4! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! —EncMstr 08:26, 23 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Hello. Creamy3 (talk) 23:26, 22 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

WP:FILMS Welcome edit

Welcome!
 

Hey, welcome to WikiProject Films! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of films, awards, festivals, filmmaking, and film characters. If you haven't already, please add {{User WikiProject Films}} to your user page.

A few features that you might find helpful:

  • Most of our important discussions about the project itself and its related articles take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.

There is a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

  • Want to jump right into editing? The style guidelines show things you should include.
  • Want to assist in some current backlogs within the project? Visit the Announcements template to see how you can help.
  • Want to know how good our articles are? Our assessment department has rated the quality of every film article in Wikipedia. Check it out!

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Nehrams2020 (talk) 23:31, 22 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Notability of Oaker Chronicle edit

 

A tag has been placed on Oaker Chronicle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb-MeMyEarsMyMouth-timed 19:27, 23 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Creamy Army WikiProject edit

I've made Creamy Army WikiProject. Wikipedia will soon be mine. Creamy3 (talk) 19:35, 23 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

You must send people messages asking them to join the Creamy Army. Creamy3 (talk) 22:13, 23 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Creamy Army edit

Calm down. They won't delete the page, they can't. Scientizzle is the only person who wants it gone, everyone else knows it's harmless. Creamy3 (talk) 21:24, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

I wouldn't say he's being a jerk, but he is being a fickle-pick. He wants attention I assume. But he's a good person at heart, that I know. Creamy3 (talk) 21:27, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
I'll say. Ha ha ha ha. Creamy3 (talk) 21:30, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

I like you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cookies&CreamForMe (talkcontribs) 21:37, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Tell me the name of this Creamy and send me a link to their user page. Creamy3 (talk) 21:40, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Recruits edit

I want more recruits for the Creamy Army! I want dozens, hundreds, thousands, millions! Creamy3 (talk) 22:59, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fuck you! Don't disrespect Creamy3! Creamy3 (talk) 23:08, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

No personal attacks edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — Scientizzle 23:16, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Apology edit

You get all the attention you deserve. Get about fifteen more Creamys, and you'll get much more recognition. Perhaps even "Creamy of the Month". Creamy3 (talk) 23:18, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

February 2008 edit

 

The recent edit you made to User talk:Creamy11 constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. —αἰτίας discussion 23:35, 27 February 2008 (UTC))Reply

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Murder, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you.
I reverted your change because it is

  • badly spelled
  • An unsupported addition
  • The end-of-page reference added for it doesn't exist and is obviously bogus.

-- ArglebargleIV (talk) 23:37, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

  1. A quick check shows that the book doesn't exist, whether it's called "Homocide in Kazachestan", "Murder in Kazachestan", or even if you spell "Homicide" and/or "Kazakhstan" correctly.
  2. Your references to a 33rd edition and a book of nearly 6000 pages (for a current country that was a province of the Soviet Union in 1973, by the way) was a red flag about a fake source as well.
  3. That was not an attack, that was a warning about putting fake sources and badly written and spelled sources in Wikipedia articles. Errors, however introduced, must be corrected.
  4. Wikipedia is not a game or social club.

-- ArglebargleIV (talk) 23:48, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

thats weird edit

since your only 3 years older than me.... Creamy11 (talk) 23:39, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to San Diego, California. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. ScarianCall me Pat 23:43, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Remember... edit

...that this is an encyclopedia, not Myspace or somewhere to chat with your friends. If you fail to edit constructively, you will be blocked. John Reaves 16:28, 28 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Films February 2008 Newsletter edit

The February 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:28, 1 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Jewbird edit

Would like to start the Wikipedia page for The Jewbird? Creamy3 (talk) 20:46, 4 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Films coordinator elections edit

The WikiProject Films coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect five coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by March 28! Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 04:27, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Films March 2008 Newsletter edit

The March 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:09, 2 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppetry case edit

 

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Creamy3 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Blueboy96 20:50, 4 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

I am not a sockpuppet edit

I am only a classmate of Creamy3 who turned me on to Wikipedia. I can only speculate but I believe it was Cookies&CreamForMe that created Chetlover and used that sockpuppet to vandalize other pages.

 
This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
Creamy4 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
198.237.17.15 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Seicer

  • Blocking administrator: not provided.

Decline reason: You're blocked for vandalism. Wait for the blocks to expire and make only useful edits from now on, please. — Sandstein (talk) 22:18, 4 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!