Cprosper1
Cprosper1, you are invited to the Teahouse
editHi Cprosper1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Juliette Longuet (July 23)
editPlease read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
contributions to Wikipedia!
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Julliette Longuet
editActually, you fixed almost all of the issues with wording I had! Only two things left to do: 1) Remove or provide a reference for the line her use of chiffon, silk and lace creates an ultra feminine look with European sensibility. 2) Remove the "Personal Life" section, it is unreferenced and we don't need that level of detail. After that, go ahead and resubmit the article! Good job! Cerebellum (talk) 00:07, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Your submission at AfC Juliette Longuet was accepted
editThe article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Coin945 (talk) 06:13, 5 September 2014 (UTC)Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Juliette Longuet for deletion
editA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Juliette Longuet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juliette Longuet until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 00:23, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
The file File:Juliette Longuet.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Personal image / non-notable person, unused
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 1989 (talk) 21:25, 26 July 2019 (UTC)