CofJ

Hello, CofJ! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Sam Blacketer (talk) 22:19, 13 February 2009 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

I realise this is somewhat belated. Sam Blacketer (talk) 22:19, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Caroline Cox, Baroness Cox

When you made this edit to Caroline Cox, Baroness Cox, you removed a template which indicated that the page is currently protected from editing by new or unregistered users. Can I ask you to be careful not to do so, because other editors need to know the status of the article?

I would encourage you not to continue the continual changing of the article between two rival versions? This is known as a 'revert war' and is considered harmful. Your edit summary also characterised the previous version as 'vandalism'; it is best not to use this sort of description unless it is obvious that the other editor was not making an honest attempt to improve the article, and I do not think that is the case here.

The best thing to do is to go to the article talk page and to explain why you dislike the version which the other editor preferred, and then to discuss and negotiate over the content so that you can come to an agreement. Sam Blacketer (talk) 22:19, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard

Although the other editor should as a matter of courtesy informed you of this discussion, you should not delete such posts; this is vandalism. If you have a reply, please comment there. --Rodhullandemu 16:06, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Question for you on Cox talk page

[1] rootology (C)(T) 19:23, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Caroline Cox, Baroness Cox

This article has been protected again because of edit warring. You need to discuss these edits on the article's talk page; or else it will just keep getting protected for longer periods of time. rootology (C)(T) 17:57, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 18:58, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Admins on Baroness Cox

I've asked other admins to review this all here. Just a note--I've got no history, involvement, or anything here, beyond having protected the article temporarily to stop edit warring by multiple users. Please weigh in on that thread on WP:ANI. rootology (C)(T) 19:11, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Baroness Cox

Could you provide some sources to back up your edits? I'm trying to find sources but not having much luck. AlistairMcMillan (talk) 19:36, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

User:SineBot

Hi

I rolled-back your edit to User:SineBot thinking it was vandalism (normally you'd communicate with a regular editor via their talk page, not their user page, and SineBot is a bot, not a human).

If you wish to chat to SineBot's operator please locate and use their talk page.

Cheers, This flag once was red^propaganda_deeds 19:48, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

February 2009

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for making legal threats or taking legal action. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia as long as the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. If you believe that a legal action is warranted, you may contact our information team at info-en@wikimedia.org and they may forward it to our legal counsel or a more appropriate venue. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Toddst1 (talk) 20:48, 18 February 2009 (UTC)