dirty corporations

edit

i could swear someone is hired by Kinross Gold to regularly monitor this article and make sure none of us reveal any of the ugly truths of gold mining. to the employee: get yourself some moral standards and find a new job. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.188.84.8 (talk) 07:08, 8 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

HEMP WOMAN

edit

ARE YOU A WRITER - I OPPOSE DELETION OF THE ARTICLE — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.166.2.20 (talk) 19:21, 24 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

advertising medium

edit

I didnt write the article you removed nor am i opposed to its removal but I do wonder what you saw as advertising material in Polysomnographic technician Je.rrt (talk) 15:46, 23 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Blocking template

edit

Please leave it be--no good can come from this edit-warring. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 19:42, 23 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi! I noticed that you were very quick to reverting that annoying vandal. Have a cookie for dealing with them. :) Sophus Bie (talk) 05:43, 24 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The No Spam Barnstar
For tirelessly combating spammers :). D Namtar 03:34, 27 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

A brownie for you!

edit
  Hello Claviere! I hope you accept this brownie as an amicable greeting from a fellow Wikipedian, SwisterTwister talk 07:11, 27 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

jeanclaudeperez user and codexbiogenesis request

edit

dear sir yes my reuest was to suppress the bad and conflicting old content of my talk page in my jean-claude perez user section! many thanks authorizing this task best regard jean-claude perez alias codexbiogenesis examples from my reseach: http://www.scribd.com/doc/53748414/2010-Perez-Codon-Populations-in-Single-Stranded-Whole-Human-Genome-DNA-Are-Fractal-and-Fine-Tuned-by-the-Golden-Ratio http://www.scribd.com/doc/57828784/jcperezBeijing032011 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.229.26.74 (talk) 17:56, 28 August 2011 (UTC)Reply


Speedy deletion converted to PROD: Frozball

edit

Hello Claviere. I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on Frozball to a proposed deletion tag, because I do not believe CSD applies to the page in question. Arguable, but I think "hoax" implies intent to deceive; if it was claimed that this was played worldwide, or an Olympic sport, I would go along with "hoax", but these guys have really invented a game and want to tell the world about it. They don't understand that's not what WP is for, and it fails WP:NFT, but that's not a speedy reason. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 17:03, 28 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Can't disagree with that :-) Thanks, Claviere (talk) 17:06, 28 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

New Page Patrol survey

edit
 

New page patrol – Survey Invitation


Hello Claviere! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.


You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Nomination of Silicon Milkroundabout for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Silicon Milkroundabout is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silicon Milkroundabout until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. FunkyCanute (talk) 11:45, 10 November 2011 (UTC)Reply