Christodouloug534

Welcome!

Hello, Christodouloug534, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Bubba hotep 22:00, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Please refer to item 5. Your item on the school is likely to be deleted as encyclopedic entries should first of all assert some kind of notability and secondly contain more than an address. Besides that, thank you for your contributions. Bubba hotep 22:03, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

For future reference, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag on articles you have created yourself. I'm sure it was not your intention to do so, but please wait until someone else does so. I was going to take it off anyway, but please leave the other tags on there which are there to give you an idea of what is needed to make the article acceptable. Thanks and good luck. Bubba hotep 22:20, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Julian Vince

Someone else has tagged this for speedy deletion. If you wish to contest it, please follow the instructions on the tag. Don't remove it yourself. Bubba hotep 22:23, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Confusion

Don't worry about it. It can be very confusing at times. My advice to a new person (I used to be one once): read everything three times, very slowly, before doing anything! I can't guarantee your articles won't get deleted, unfortunately (I'm not the one who does), but good luck. Bubba hotep 22:33, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Knights Templar School

Have a look now. I've formatted it to a standard which nears Wikipedia's recognised style (sort of). Points to note are:

• Don't include phrases like "the school boasts" - this is seen as lacking neutrality in tone, see WP:NPOV
• I've added wikilinks - the words that are clickable and lead to other places on Wikipedia - try to add these in whatever articles you do. BUT - don't add too many and (although this is not a rule, it is my personal preference) don't add any which link nowhere (red links) - unless you intend to make those articles as well
• This article desparately needs sources now. Everything on Wikipedia must be sourced and verifiable - you obviously have knowledge of the school, but everyone else might think you made it up! Add links to the OFSTED report, for example. Press coverage, anything like that. Anything that proves it is both notable and, indeed, existant (is that a word?) It especially needs some third party corroboration about the Knights Templar being buried there (or at least a reputable mention about who said they were!) - this is why I added [CITATION NEEDED] to it
• Add a link to the school's website

I can't tell you exactly what to do because you will find great joy in trying and doing it yourself - which, I suppose, is the reason you came here in the first place! I can give you my tu'penneth worth, though. I suppose it was the Hertfordshire affinity what made me do it, guv. (I'm from Herts too - although I must be honest, I didn't know this school existed until now)

Finally, good luck - again! Any problems, you know where I am. Bubba hotep 22:56, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

STOP PRESS - I found some links and integrated them into the article. Sorry, it was intriguing me. I will leave the one that really caught my attention (about the Knights Templar being buried around there) to you. Let me know if you find anything on the web and I'll add it for you. Bubba hotep 23:22, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Crimea medal.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Crimea medal.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:07, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Peter-Brinsden.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Peter-Brinsden.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:09, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Bourn Hall.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bourn Hall.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:05, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:EGBowen.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:EGBowen.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:05, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Bab Ballads

Hello. I see you made some edits to the Bab Ballads article. If you like G&S (or just G), check out WP:G&S. Best regards, -- Ssilvers 15:43, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Vyvyan.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Vyvyan.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:08, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Martine1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Martine1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:08, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Debbie thrower.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Debbie thrower.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:08, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Pellegrini.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Pellegrini.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:03, 16 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. The Sunshine Man 12:03, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Samuel Ifor Enoch

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Samuel Ifor Enoch, by Whstchy (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Samuel Ifor Enoch seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Samuel Ifor Enoch, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 20:01, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Peter Brinsden

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Peter Brinsden, by Whstchy (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Peter Brinsden seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Peter Brinsden, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 20:14, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:EGBowen.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:EGBowen.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Strangerer (Talk) 16:10, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Copyright violation in Emrys G. Bowen

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Emrys G. Bowen, by Whstchy, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Emrys G. Bowen is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Emrys G. Bowen, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Emrys G. Bowen itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 21:45, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Debbie thrower.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Debbie thrower.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:25, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Debbie thrower.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Debbie thrower.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:45, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Christodouloug534 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

86.152.81.34 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Jack1956". The reason given for Jack1956's block is: "see Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/86.152.81.41".

• Blocking administrator: Akhilleus (talk • blocks)

---

Decline reason: This account appears to be another sockpuppet account, judging from prior evidence and comparison of contributions. In addition to declining this request, I'm blocking this account from editing. – Luna Santin (talk) 21:45, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:ArthurEnglish.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:ArthurEnglish.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:24, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Johnreed.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Johnreed.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:26, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Martine1.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Martine1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:52, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Pellegrini.jpg

Please note I removed the licensing tag from this image as it was plainly incorrect - the image is not self made, it is a copyrighted work from Vanity Fair. As such I have tagged the image to have no licensing information. Please provide the correction information as soon as possible, or the image may be deleted. Thank you. EliminatorJR ^Talk 15:10, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Christodouloug534 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have been writing and editing for wikipedia since November 2006. The accusation of sock-puppetry is unfair and unfounded. I cannot work on the articles I have created and I request that the block is lifted. Thanks Christodouloug534 17:38, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I can't disagree with Luna's reasoning here at all. Please edit from only one account. It's pretty clear that the two accounts are operated by the same person. — Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 15:18, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Terry Wiles

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Terry Wiles, by IDX (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Terry Wiles fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

Blatant copyright infringement of http://www.terrywiles.20m.com/ (G12). No license given on site. Site content presumed unfree.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Terry Wiles, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 15:30, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:CAIAPHAS2.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:CAIAPHAS2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Durin 13:19, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Sophrony.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Sophrony.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:07, 18 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 01:07, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Leannewilson.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Leannewilson.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih (talk) 04:01, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Julian_vince.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Julian_vince.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih (talk) 02:40, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Soulsby.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Soulsby.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jusjih (talk • contribs) 02:41, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Martine1.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Martine1.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Garion96 (talk) 16:34, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Terryscott.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Terryscott.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 21:25, 15 April 2008 (UTC) --Polly (Parrot) 21:25, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:JTWilliams1976.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:JTWilliams1976.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:43, 25 September 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:43, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

File:Gac3.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gac3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 20:24, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Bob Bingham for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bob Bingham is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Bingham until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. edtiorEهեইдအီးËეεઈדוארई電子ಇអ៊ី전자ഇī 02:17, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Johnreed.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Johnreed.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:50, 9 February 2022 (UTC)