Speedy deletion nomination of User:Carld307/sandbox

edit

Hello Carld307,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged User:Carld307/sandbox for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Djembayz (talk) 03:05, 7 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi Djembayz, Can you please tell me how/why you consider the article promotional? I'd be happy to rewrite but would like to know beforehand what seems promotional. Paragraph 1 is boilerplate simply telling who New Pig is and what's it's become. It's true; it's factual. Paragraphs 2, 3, 4 tells how & why the product was invented and how the company got its name. This answers the number one question on everyone's mind, "Where did the pig name come from?" So doesn't it makes sense to include that information? Paragraphs 5 & 6 describe the company's growth over 30 years. Again only facts, not promotion. By the way, the article is patterned after another Pennsylvania company on Wikipedia, Mine Safety Appliances, which tells about its company's history, products and growth. Isn't this similar to what we tried to do? So please let me know what should be done to make the article less promotional and acceptable for Wikipedia. Thanks for your help and consideration in this matter. Carld307 (talk) 18:40, 12 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 27)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 18:36, 27 August 2015 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Carld307, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 18:36, 27 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: New Pig (September 16)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kethrus was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
--I am Kethrus Talk to me! 23:32, 16 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question

edit

  Hello, Carld307! I'm Wikiisawesome. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. /wia /tlk 00:21, 13 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: New Pig (November 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 21:41, 17 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: New Pig (December 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 23:31, 8 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

As per previous instructions, added verifiable, reliable sources

edit

What am I missing? Is it quantity? I can add more reliable sources if that's the problem. Is it quality? Please provide more specific direction. Thank you. Carld307 (talk) 17:03, 9 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Draft:New Pig concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:New Pig, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 9 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:New Pig

edit
 

Hello, Carld307. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "New Pig".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Puffin Let's talk! 10:21, 26 June 2016 (UTC)Reply