Dear user Cjs56, there are more than 100 million entries under wikipedia, not all are edited by me, vandalising is a wrong word used by you and it's arrogance and ignorance on your part. Please read the footnote about Dr. Satish Mohan. I would produce a few documents to prove what I am writing.

Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

edit
Hello Cjs56! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. You may also push the signature button   located above the edit window. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! -- LittleOldMe 10:26, 8 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Getting Help
Getting along
Getting technical
 

Dear Gentleman, I am pained by the fact that the people who see Dr. Mohan as the town supervisor of Amherst town, only see him as a philanthropic by virtue of what he propagates about himself. The fact is that the famous proverb "charity begins at home" does not apply to him as with most of the politicians, as when there are matters which deals with his personal interest or benefit, he takes it up in not so sincere or honest manner. You may mail me your ID at candyonashell@yahoo.com and I would send you the reality. Candyonashell

Satish Mohan

edit

Candyonashell, you've once again reverted the Satish Mohan article to a version which is not written in an encyclopedic manner. In doing so, you also eliminated a significant amount of work I did in cleaning the article stylisitically and in inseserting internal and external links. The most glaring problem is that you bolded information which many people would view as negative. I think about 80% of what you wrote is factual and verifiable but you insisist on wrapping it up in weasel words. I'm going to leave your version for today in hopes that you will edit it to bring it into line with wikipedia policies. --Cjs56 14:20, 30 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Listen, a lot of what you wrote brushes pretty close to libel. Also, a lot of it is nonsensical. (He) normally adopts to penetrate the voters acceptability using emotional projections which may lack reality. What does that even mean? I don't know, and it's not verifiable and its not neutrally worded. If you've got a bone to pick with Mohan, then why not write a paragraph about his insistance on signing every paycheck (and cite it), or his pretty vicious fights with the town board early in his tenure (and cite it), or his poor relations with the town's labor union (and cite it). Because you are new on wikipedia, I have tried to be tolerant when you break the rules, but it seems that you are just here to be disruptive because of a personal grudge. --Cjs56 13:59, 3 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Blocked

edit

You've been blocked for 48 hours for repeated blatant POV violations. --Wafulz 14:35, 7 May 2007 (UTC)Reply