User talk:CambridgeBayWeather/Archive03

Latest comment: 18 years ago by Lommer in topic Kenn Borek Air

DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.

Hello.

edit

Hello. I wanted to reply this a long time ago, but I was too busy to spare some time for you, due to the fact that you are not someone or something I should put my attention on. You are a waste of my time. Do you have a lot of time on your hands? Do you constantly browse on Wikipedia pages? Seems like it to me. And may I ask, how is it considered 'vandalism' when anyone can edit the page. Vandalism. "Some vandalism qualifies as culture jamming or sniggling — it is artistic in nature as well as being carried out illegally or without the property owner's permission." Without the owner's permission.. so who WAS the owner of that page? You? Doubt it. And you'll be glad too when you visit Wikipedia's home page and find this! "Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit." Let me hi-light this incase you cannot read. "..THAT ANYONE CAN EDIT." ANYONE includes me. So if I have been given the right to "EDIT" then why not? This leads to my final point. Mind Your Own Business. MYOB. Thank You.

Vandalism vs. Bias

edit

I noticed that you issued a Test 3 Warning to 61.246.44.77. If you are referring to the articles I think you are (Kashmir-related articles), please be aware that from what I have seen, this user's edits constitute bias, not vandalism. If I recall, POV on articles does not constitute vandalism (did I miss some change to the vandalism policy?). I have left a message on his talk page advising him to conform to the NPOV policy. Unless his edits change in their nature, I do not believe that this user deserves to be accused of vandalism. He could be a "clueless newbie". Please do not issue vandalism accusations unless they are truly warranted. Thanks. Roy Al Blue 20:35, 1 December 2005 (UTC)Reply


~~Edit~~ This is user 61.246.44.77. Before one accuses me of bias kindly read well on the subjects, read history on that perticular subject and also refer to the intelligence reports, that is, if you get any.

kindly state in detail what you are referring to...

edit

Thank you!

edit
 
REDVERS awards this Random Act Of Kindness Barnstar to CambridgeBayWeather for reverting vandalism to my userpage.

Skateboarding

edit

Thanks for catching the extra bonus vandalism on this one! FreplySpang (talk) 23:06, 1 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Franco Lopez

edit

I'm not sure, but ABCD just deleted it anyway. If the article reappears I'll look at it. Not that I know anything about Counter-Reformation theology! :) But there's a bit of an IRC conversation going on about it. FreplySpang (talk) 23:11, 1 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Message from Eddie (Atlantic Hurricane Page)

edit

Hey, CambridgeBeyWeather. I create a Page in My archive that focuses on Atlantic Hurricanes and there names. Check it out and tell Me with You think. -- Eddie 10:30 PM, December 1, 2005 (EST)

Jamie Crosby

edit

Can you just leave it for a few hours? It's Jamie's birthday today and he has always wanted to be famous, even if it's just a small wiki.

RfC for 80.217.152.161

edit

Howdy, I have drafted an RfC on my Temp page concerning the anonymous editor of Darod & Hawiye. He apparently evaded a block yesterday, but it's been quiet since then (the block still has a few hours, though). Was it a good idea to write this about the user, or should I have made it about the articles themselves? I'm just not sure how this will affect a non-responsive anonymous editor. But let me know what you think. Thanks, -- Gyrofrog (talk) 16:27, 2 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

OK, it's live, here. I added the possible block evasion. Thank you! -- Gyrofrog (talk) 16:47, 2 December 2005 (UTC)Reply
Thanks again! I was about to update the user's talk page(s) myself. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 16:59, 2 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Thank You!

edit
 

Hi CambridgeBayWeather,

I would like to thank you for your kind support on my RfA. I'll do my best to be a good administrator. If you need anything, or if I ever do something wrong with my new powers, please contact me. Mushroom 16:53, 2 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Hi... suggestion to lock a topic of Wikipedia

edit

The topic I just edited, U.C. Sampdoria (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sampdoria) is being modified continuously by Genoa CFC fans that are writing racist and useless paragraphs to that topic. All I've done is removing that paragraph, which is quoted below, cause I just don't think that it's fair for us Sampdoria fans being insulted on a prestigious information and knowledge source such as Wikipedia. And also, it's not like we Sampdoria fans modify their page, by adding that in our city they're called "chickens", or whatever.

So therefore I suggest to limit somehow, for some times, the editability of that page. Thankyou for your attention.

This is the paragraph I feel like it has to be removed:

"At the time of the club's founding people from the southern regions of Italy were beginning to move into Genoa. It is believed that many of them picked up the newly established team as their own, especially in the neighborhoods close to the steel mills and the naval arsenals where they worked. This led supporters of the Genoa Cricket and Football Club to dub all of Sampdoria's supporters with the derogatory term 'Gabibbi' ('Gabibbo', from Cabib/Habib, is Genoese for a person of southern or Levantine/North African descent). Another disparaging nickname for Sampdoria's players is 'cyclists', this stems from their horizontally-striped jerseys, resulting from the merging of the original white-blue colours of 'Andrea Doria' and the red-black ones of 'Sampierdarenese' ('SAMPierdarenese + 'Andrea DORIA' = SAMPDORIA), which, in the 1950s did bear a striking resemblance with the attire of professional bicycle riders."

Sudbury Airport redux

edit

Could you please review the municipal government situation of Greater Sudbury before rewriting the airport article again? There's no such thing as a "Municipality of Sudbury" from which Garson, Skead and the airport are in any way separate -- there's only one municipality in the area, its exact name is "City of Greater Sudbury", and Garson, Skead and the airport are all within it. The airport is northeast of the city's downtown core to be sure, but it's still inside the city limits. "Greater Sudbury" isn't a metropolitan agglomeration of independent towns and cities like Greater Vancouver or the Greater Toronto Area; it's the actual name of a single city with a single municipal government. Bearcat 03:51, 3 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

That's fine...I don't have a problem with the thing about the airport's name (except to note that you actually removed the paragraph that addressed the fact that it uses both names in different contexts). I was just concerned about the way your rewrite created a perception that "Greater Sudbury" and "Sudbury" were somehow two different things and the airport was actually outside the boundaries of one of them. I think probably the CFS didn't update its information when the city's political status changed in 2001. Bearcat 07:49, 3 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

RfA thanks

edit

I would like to thank you for your support of my recent successful RfA. If you have any further comments or feedback for me, my door's open - don't hesistate to drop a note on my talk page. Happy editing! (So, you would've voted oppose if not at work and not quite so sober? ;) I don't quite know, the idea of editing at the pub doesn't seem quite right) Enochlau 11:05, 3 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Vegetation in tropical desserts of australia speedy

edit

Your speedying of Vegetation in tropical desserts of australia with the summary "(Nonsense)" was a blatant violation of your admin responsibilities: WP:CSD makes it clear that the meaning of "nonsense" in this context is given by WP:PN, and if you are going to carry out speedies, you are responsible to understand how to apply "is so completely and irredeemably confused that no intelligent person can be expected to make sense of it". The revision you deleted, while hardly polished and at least in part better suited to a talk page, is full of perfectly sensible information that you should not have speedied for that reason. Please reread the relevant portion of WP:CSD and all of WP:PN, and respond here on your talk page User talk:CambridgeBayWeather.
--Jerzyt 17:15, 3 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Sorry about that I was going to redirect it to Eucalyptus as it's a copy of the overview section, without the pictures. The deleted version can be viewed at User:CambridgeBayWeather/Sandbox. Thanks for catching it. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 20:43, 3 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

What's up with Wikipedia these days...

edit

All my articles get wiped out. And yet articles on complete bullsh*t like magic (not the entertainment kind, the loser in a robe who lives in his mom's basement and thinks it's real kind" stay up. F*cking ridiculous. Memorize this in your fucking skull or even tattoo it on your body. Cause you dumb fucked admins never learn to see the difference.

Hi User:Otty, which articles still up are you talking about? CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 11:18, 4 December 2005 (UTC)Reply
Have some Pumpkin pie. I hear it makes you gain abilities of Astral projection. Oh, and after a lot of edits, maybe apply for adminship? Ronabop 11:22, 4 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for deleting the adam vs. joel article

edit

coz it was actually in my car!

This is "Neorge". I edited the Montreal Trudeau Airport page because i found stronger proof. If you got to www.admtl.com which is the main Montreal airport website, under coporate information and statistics, it has passenger traffic at 10.3 million for 2004 and 235,441 aircraft movements. I just assumed the main website would have the real numbers. Please reply with your comments. Thanks

Reply

edit

Thanks for the quick reply. I have to trun in this paper tonight (12-04-05) with at least three peer reviews. I waitimg to the last minute to write the paper. It need alot of work. It's formated in APA fprmat. See below.

Author: Tracy D. Adams Copyright: Public

Teachers requirements: 2. Cultural Values and Personal Ethics Paper in the Assignments Newsgroup by Sunday.

Using the Cultural Values and Personal Ethics Paper Template, write a 900-1,050-word paper in which you discuss the role that personal, organizational, and cultural values play in decision making in your personal and professional lives. Discuss how ethical dilemmas may arise when the values between an employee and a company or the values among different groups of stakeholders are competing. This assignment is to be written using Microsoft Word and following the APA format and style guidelines. You must use at least three peer-reviewed references in your paper.

Submit a draft of your paper to WritePoint before submitting the final draft to your instructor. Be sure to include the WritePoint report with the final draft.



My Paper

The opportunities to expand corporate profits and establish long term relationships with international businesses are not limited to geographical terrains. Advancements in technologies and an improved understanding of civilizations throughout the world triggered an economic evolution with unlimited trade and industrial opportunities. Thus, giving marketers’ enormous opportunities to gain target markets in international territories, previously out of reach to corporate America. Today’s business leaders must possess the ability to understand how personal values, organizational values, cultural values, and ethical dilemmas influence their personal and professional decisions during international business negotiations. Negotiators are people, with build in personal values, that may or may not agree with other stakeholders involve in the decision making process.

For example, during a University of Phoenix discussion thread, there were several heated discussions on the use of the English languish in Mexico during business negotiations between USAuto and AutoMex. Some, students place high values on English as the primary languish during all business negotiations initiated by US companies. Yet, other students believe the hoist nations languish should be prominent during negotiations on international platforms, regardless who initiated the conference. As a result, the personal believes of decision maker can either benefit or stifle the negotiation process (Go to Class, Wk-3, Q-1).

Abortion is considered a morale act “under certain conditions” for some people, yet deemed as a cruel murder and unnecessary action by others, in spite of the situation. Therefore, when making a personal decision to vote, people who value a women’s right to choose will vote different then those who value pro-life constituents. Who is right or who is wrong? The answers are everybody and nobody. Therefore, to rid us of this confusion, a higher organizational authority is necessary to layout our moral values and ethical guidelines.

Organizational values will set the tone during personal and business negotiations. The US legal system has strict guidelines for jury selection and will ask specific questions to test the value system of potential juries. In other words, if a potential juror is against the death penalty, then that juror could be excluded from court cases were capital punishment procedures are evolved. Unfortunately, some potential jurors will lie and falsely confess their disagreement to the death penalty, as a means to get out of the often gruesome civic responsibility called “jury duty”, a classic example of a unethical personal decision making.

Organizational values often surface during international business settings. The USAuto and AutoMex business venture depicts an obvious difference of organizational values pertaining to labor relation. USAuto views Mexico as a cheap labor pool and a means to cut manufacturing cost. While, on the other hand, AutoMex classifies its Mexican labor force as a viable identity within the international business community (Resource).

The world culture is a mold of millions of people structured with personal and organizational values. For example, a basic cultural value for all US citizens is the freedom of speech. But, China, a communist regime, punishes its citizenry for speaking against the government. Yet, China maintains its “status quo” as one of the largest international trade partners with the US. Also, US retailers like Wal-Mart sell products to millions of Americans every day, with made in China logos. Nevertheless, United States continues to have strong economic relations with a country that values the inhumane treatment of its citizens, a value opposite of the American dream of freedom and liberty. The US & China business ventures are considered as unethical business relations by most democratic societies.

Decision makers are faced with a hard decision between what is right and what is best for the organization. Often, business leaders make unethical decision to maintain the competitive edge over rivals and enhance Profitability. For example, several major US oil companies, took advantage of American consumers and hiked-up gas prices at the pumps, claiming that hurricane Katrina disrupted the volume of oil distributed to US territories. However, when the corporate third quarter earnings reports got published, the oil companies made billions in profits as a result of the unethical price hike at American gas stations. As a result, congressional hearings were call into cession to question the validity of the increase in consumer gas prices (Balz). Also, the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, persuaded some people to take advantage of kind hearted Americans and make unethical personnel decisions to steel money mark as relief aid. People were collected aid money from concerned citizens who thought they were helping their fellow citizens in a crises situation, only to find out that the money was use for personal gain. Eventually, the Government got evolved by providing a list of legitimate agencies establish to collect hurricane relief assistance.

The world of international business has created a new platform for decision makers to create opportunities to improve and achieve a higher growth potential. Therefore, personal values, organizational values, cultural values, and ethical dilemma are factors that can not be ignored during negotiations. People have different believes and value systems that filter into their organizational and cultural decision making processes. This value system can cause ethical dilemmas to surface and hinder professional and personal negotiations. As a result, governments and private organizations have developed a strict set of ethical codes and conducts in order to live a harmonies and peaceful life on earth. A classic example of ethical codes or values developed at the highest level of authority is the Geneva Conventions, an ethical treaty directing nations how to behave during war and combat situations. Therefore, Today’s decision makers need to consider the value systems use to form the ethical guidelines at the base of international business relations use to shape the global economic enterprise.

References

Resource “Scenario One: USAuto (Print Version)” University of Phoenix Retrieved December-3, 2005, from Student and Faculty web site: https://ecampus.phoenix.edu/secure/resource/resource.asp

Go to Class “Outlook Express”, MBAPA/11-15/MBAP2544-MBA 500, week-3 Thread for discussions question-1, Retrieved November 3, 2005, from Student and Faculty web site: https://myclass.phoenix.edu/exchange/root.asp?pubpath=MBAPA/11-15/MBAP2544%20MBA500 Balz, Dan “Oil Firms Turn Katrina Into Profits, Clinton Says N.Y. Senator Criticizes Lack of National Leadership, Freedom From Imports

Saturday, September 3, 2005; Page A10 Retrieved December 3, 2005, from WashingtonPost.com site:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/02/AR2005090202079.html

Slow Connection

edit

Actually, it was not a vandalism. I made a small edit but due to very slow connection from Dhaka, the browser was timing out with partial saving. I could not revert either for the slow connection. Thanks for reverting,

dhaka2000

nonsense?

edit

how am I adding nonsense? I beleave that was out of order to call my content nonsense without any explanation.. I dont know what the policies are regarding admins but I think thats a little out of line.

vandalism?

edit

how am I a vandal? because I am trying to contribute to the site? look I am very new at this and so are a lot of people.. you need to advise.. not belittle people .. I deserve a explanation or I would like to know whom I contact to fiel a grivence regarding your treatment.

prove it

edit

how do you suggest I prove that somone exists ? there are links to websites about the person.. my website si not up yet.. what, am I supposed to provide ss cards? nothing goes live until wednesday

ok so if I link to some blogs that talk about the new padcast.. then I wont get the delete?

Its me the Trudeau airport guy. Aeroport de Montreal may look like it included Mirabel, but in fact it doesn't. The only planes that land at Mirabel are cargo pleanes, so Aeroport de Montreal doesn't count them as passenger aircardt movements. Don't worry, my mom works for ADM (aeroport de montreal) and she knows that fact. So techncally, Trudeau has more aircraft movements then Calgary. Please respond. Thanks.

Where I don't see that. Besides my mom works there, and for passenger traffic it says Aeroports de Montreal. S mean more that one airport, but Trudeau is the only airport. Any way where did u get your infomration, because if you got it from the Canadian Government webiste, they constantly screw up

You just dont understand. I have proof. ADM controls two airports. Dorval and Mirabel. Mirabel is closed. They dont count any aircraft movements at Mirabel anymore, because technically its not part of their statistics. Anyway, Mirabel was opened in 2004, so thats why it says it counts for both, because last year Mirabel and Dorval were both added together. In 2005, there is only one airport. Besides, i live in Montreal, they say that stuff on the news whenever they talk about Trudeau airport and it has the same stats as the website. Montreal is the only city in Canada that had at on point 2 international airports. Thats why i can see you being confused.

I didn't say that. Mirabel opened in October 1975, and was the largest airport in the world. As of Novemeber 1st, 2004, all passenger traffic and aircraft were moved to Trudeau. They dont count cargo as aircraft movements for some reason.

Thanks. That should resolve it. I was having a bad day anyway. Sorry.

A request

edit

Can you fix the Cameron Diaz article by reverting that guy again? He's wrecking the article.

Reverting vandalism

edit

You are very fast at reverting vandalism, I was just going to revert some vandalism on the Bill Gates page and then noticed you had already done it before me, keep it up! — Wackymacs 16:48, 6 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Test

edit

Test ISP# for new ISP. 205.234.33.32 04:15, 7 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

List of villains

edit

It was a mistake, pure and simple. I think I had the old version open in one tab and the one I was editing in another, and then edited the wrong one. Thanks for noticing! (And by the way, if you have an opinion on whether the page should be organized alphabetically or by medium, it'd be great if you would comment in the straw poll at Talk:List of villains.) —Josiah Rowe (talkcontribs) 20:12, 7 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Open source editing at its best. :) —Josiah Rowe (talkcontribs) 20:23, 7 December 2005 (UTC)Reply
edit

Rewrote the text. Hope it's ok that way now...

Thanx,

--Maddel 09:44, 8 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Tool Identification

edit

I don't have a picture. I really wish I did, but I don't. If you want to guess, here is the page. Thanks for your quick response. --Think Fast 01:43, 9 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Tool Identification II

edit

No scanner either. Sorry. You can guess anyway if you want to. --Think Fast 01:47, 9 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Schaumburg-Lippe

edit

Thank you for editing out the nonsense about "Schaumburg-Lippe" in the Winslow and Anheuser articles. These revisions have been posted by someone trying to insert himself into unrelated articles.

Narnia

edit

Why do you think the anon contributions to Chronicles of Narnia are vandalism? They seem to be fair criticism to me. jmd 08:31, 9 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

  • Sorry for the confusion. I think my browser must have been caching the page content. And then I must have read the diffs back to front. jmd

Tool 3

edit

Hi. I've left two earlier message concerning the identification of a tool. I tried to make a diagram of the tool, but I messed up. Can you delete this [1] image for me? I had my width and length settings too big in paint, so it is way too big. I uploaded a smaller version here [2]. Thanks. --Think Fast 00:12, 10 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Protected Vandalism

edit

Hi. First, I'd like to thank you for all of your anti-vandalism efforts on the Bergen County Academies page. Due to the large amount of vandalism (from BCA students), I think you locked/protected the page. However, now, a lot of vandalism remains (particularly under "The Academies"), and most people are powerless to change it. Would it be possible to remove the nonsense so that a clean version is locked in?

Thanks, Ricky

Clan Fraser

edit

Hi. I noticed your edits in Clan Fraser. If you'll look at the page, you'll notice that when you changed "Indepednence" to "Independance" the link stop working. "Independence" is the page we're after. Along with that, with the exception of "Bourne," most of Derek Ross's grammatical edits were good ones, including "acquiring." I'll go through and fix it myself, but I thought I'd let you know. Thanks for your enthusiasm. Canaen 06:23, 10 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

David Beckham

edit

No problem. If I remember rightly, it was clear to start with, then someone added a couple of sentences in between which made it look like the last sentence could have referred to either. File:Yemen flag large.png CTOAGN (talk) 16:24, 10 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Blond

edit
So sorry, I don't know what happened there. I clicked in the history to revert the previous user's addition of demographic figures (he has been adding bogus statistics to various articles). I've restored your edit now. Michael Z. 2005-12-11 17:39 Z

Vandalism

edit

Hi, Thanks for your vandalism efforts on theta function, but please be sure to check the edit history first: you only rolled back some of the vandalism, not all of it. It may not have been obvious, but the vandal used multiple IP addresses. linas 17:50, 11 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Vandalism 2

edit

Thank you for removing the vandalism on my user page. Garion96 (talk) 22:22, 11 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

80.217.152.161 redux

edit

He's been back a couple of times since I posted the RfC. Speaking of, that didn't seem to go anywhere. Will the RfC help us at all, e.g. give us more leverage when dealing with this person in the future? The image at Jubba Airways is also a copyvio, which I've just listed. The uploader has a user account but posted the image about 10 minutes after our anonymous user made his edit. So I wonder if it's a coincidence, a collaboration, or the anon has been forgetting to sign in. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 15:58, 12 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Types of Two-Thirds Votes?

edit

Hi,

I see that the Supermajority/Two-Thirds Votes article says that the Yes votes must be at least twice the amount of No votes. However, I've seen some systems where they calculate it as two-thirds of the total of Yes and No votes, with the potential of big differences in the result. What can you tell me about this? Do you know of any resources that discuss these differences?

For example, let's say 90 people are voting on Proposal A.

Yes votes = 55 No votes = 35

The method in your article indicates that 70 votes would have been required for Proposal A to pass (35 * 2 = 70), and it clearly fails by 15 votes.

However, if you use the other method, the proposal only fails by five votes. (90 * .6666 = 59.994)

I just discovered this, and I'm amazed at how different the outcome can be. Any thoughts on this issue -- and/or any additional resources -- would be much appreciated.

By the way, I tried to post something on the discussion page, but I received an notice saying an article called Supermajority doesn't exist.

Best, Eric M. em@bitstream.net

Talk:Supermajority. The article should be there now and you can add to it. Because you don't yet have an account you can't make new pages so I made a blank one. I looked at the edits and I really didn't add anything to the article just reverted some vandalism. I thinkyour best bet is to go to Wikipedia:Reference desk/Mathematics. Good luck. Hope you get an account. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 21:10, 12 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Reposting of a "vandalism" article

edit

I got your name from the AFD for "Irish Catholic Rebels" where you made the decision to speedily delete this garbage.

The page has been re-posted under Irish Catholic Rebel. Do we have to go through the process all over again?  Camillus talk|contribs 22:04, 12 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Vandalism

edit

No problem. Mine got done too by the same user. -- Francs2000   22:51, 12 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Re:Your User Page

edit

No problem :)--Shanel 22:52, 12 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Re:Your User Page

edit

No problem. I think it was just me - forgot to sign in! Sholto Maud 03:27, 13 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Thats the information i got from the Sydney International Airport site, i just copied it and changed the numbers.

Genoa

edit

Well, the complete and right name, as you made me note, is Genoa Cricket & Football Club. I guess it should be left as it was, and Genoa C.F.C. be a redirect to that page. But it's just a personal opinion. --Angelo 16:54, 13 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

User:71.69.130.255

edit

This is my IP. I blanked my page, and I'm about to revert it. --User:UrineForGas

Yea, I'm Cupro Chlorous

I'm not yet used to the wiki-formatting

I guess hydroscopic would be a property

Kenn Borek Air

edit
copied from User talk:Lommer

I noticed that the link to Maldivian Airlines has remained red for a while now. I was just wondering if you meant airlines in the Maldives or a company called Maldivian Airlines. Thanks. [unsigned message from CambridgeBayWeather]

Nope, I meant a specific company called Maldivian Airlines. I don't really know enough about them to write an article, but I know a guy who flew for Borek and went down to the maldives for a few months every year. -User:Lommer | talk 04:59, 16 December 2005 (UTC)Reply
OK. I don't know anything about them either and couldn't find them in Google but I did see that Maldivian Air Taxi has Borek's Twin Otters Company site. That's why I wondered. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 05:09, 16 December 2005 (UTC)Reply
Ah crap you're right. It is Maldivian Air Taxi (I recognize the pics on their site) that I was thinking of. I've heard a lot of people call them Maldivian Airlines, that's why I was confused. -User:Lommer | talk 05:13, 16 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

List of Dicators

edit

I replied to you here